Extremely long time to establish network link with Nexus N9K-C9372-PX-E












1















This switch is completely default, no configuration has been done other than resetting it to default configuration, and going through the normal naming of the switch and time etc.



The problem I'm seeing is that it takes 30-45 seconds for clients to get fully linked/connected. So for example, if we restart one of our Ubuntu clients, the Ubuntu machine will get to the login screen and then it takes another good 30-40 seconds before we will get the notification saying "Connection established".



Comparing this to our other switches that generally have the connection ready within 3-5 seconds after hitting the login screen. Is there something specific to the switch that I can change to reduce the time it takes to establish a connection?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Kevin Vasko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Not enough information. Could it be spanning tree that causing your issue?

    – Ron Trunk
    9 hours ago











  • Logging in is host-specific which is off-topic here. You need to add details on when the link LED comes on (physical layer) and when data transfer starts (data link layer, check switch port status).

    – Zac67
    9 hours ago













  • @RonTrunk As in configuring the switch for spanning tree? Or are you asking if I have loops in the network? If it is the latter, it does not have loops in the network. This is a diagram of the network. imgur.com/HpBrAnU

    – Kevin Vasko
    9 hours ago











  • @Zac67 I'm not talking about logging in. I'm talking about how long it takes between when the connection is marked active and usable, I was using the login scenario as an example. In Ubuntu I can unplug the cable going to the 10Gb switch, plug it back in, and it takes 30-45 seconds before the connection is up and functioning (e.g. the little network connection wheel keeps spinning). If I plug the system up to one of our 1Gb switches it takes about 10 seconds.

    – Kevin Vasko
    9 hours ago











  • The "little network connection wheel" is a host feature. Check out the switch LED/status instead.

    – Zac67
    9 hours ago
















1















This switch is completely default, no configuration has been done other than resetting it to default configuration, and going through the normal naming of the switch and time etc.



The problem I'm seeing is that it takes 30-45 seconds for clients to get fully linked/connected. So for example, if we restart one of our Ubuntu clients, the Ubuntu machine will get to the login screen and then it takes another good 30-40 seconds before we will get the notification saying "Connection established".



Comparing this to our other switches that generally have the connection ready within 3-5 seconds after hitting the login screen. Is there something specific to the switch that I can change to reduce the time it takes to establish a connection?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Kevin Vasko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Not enough information. Could it be spanning tree that causing your issue?

    – Ron Trunk
    9 hours ago











  • Logging in is host-specific which is off-topic here. You need to add details on when the link LED comes on (physical layer) and when data transfer starts (data link layer, check switch port status).

    – Zac67
    9 hours ago













  • @RonTrunk As in configuring the switch for spanning tree? Or are you asking if I have loops in the network? If it is the latter, it does not have loops in the network. This is a diagram of the network. imgur.com/HpBrAnU

    – Kevin Vasko
    9 hours ago











  • @Zac67 I'm not talking about logging in. I'm talking about how long it takes between when the connection is marked active and usable, I was using the login scenario as an example. In Ubuntu I can unplug the cable going to the 10Gb switch, plug it back in, and it takes 30-45 seconds before the connection is up and functioning (e.g. the little network connection wheel keeps spinning). If I plug the system up to one of our 1Gb switches it takes about 10 seconds.

    – Kevin Vasko
    9 hours ago











  • The "little network connection wheel" is a host feature. Check out the switch LED/status instead.

    – Zac67
    9 hours ago














1












1








1








This switch is completely default, no configuration has been done other than resetting it to default configuration, and going through the normal naming of the switch and time etc.



The problem I'm seeing is that it takes 30-45 seconds for clients to get fully linked/connected. So for example, if we restart one of our Ubuntu clients, the Ubuntu machine will get to the login screen and then it takes another good 30-40 seconds before we will get the notification saying "Connection established".



Comparing this to our other switches that generally have the connection ready within 3-5 seconds after hitting the login screen. Is there something specific to the switch that I can change to reduce the time it takes to establish a connection?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Kevin Vasko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












This switch is completely default, no configuration has been done other than resetting it to default configuration, and going through the normal naming of the switch and time etc.



The problem I'm seeing is that it takes 30-45 seconds for clients to get fully linked/connected. So for example, if we restart one of our Ubuntu clients, the Ubuntu machine will get to the login screen and then it takes another good 30-40 seconds before we will get the notification saying "Connection established".



Comparing this to our other switches that generally have the connection ready within 3-5 seconds after hitting the login screen. Is there something specific to the switch that I can change to reduce the time it takes to establish a connection?







cisco 10gbase






share|improve this question









New contributor




Kevin Vasko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Kevin Vasko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 9 hours ago









Ron Trunk

35.2k33372




35.2k33372






New contributor




Kevin Vasko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 9 hours ago









Kevin VaskoKevin Vasko

1061




1061




New contributor




Kevin Vasko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Kevin Vasko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Kevin Vasko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • Not enough information. Could it be spanning tree that causing your issue?

    – Ron Trunk
    9 hours ago











  • Logging in is host-specific which is off-topic here. You need to add details on when the link LED comes on (physical layer) and when data transfer starts (data link layer, check switch port status).

    – Zac67
    9 hours ago













  • @RonTrunk As in configuring the switch for spanning tree? Or are you asking if I have loops in the network? If it is the latter, it does not have loops in the network. This is a diagram of the network. imgur.com/HpBrAnU

    – Kevin Vasko
    9 hours ago











  • @Zac67 I'm not talking about logging in. I'm talking about how long it takes between when the connection is marked active and usable, I was using the login scenario as an example. In Ubuntu I can unplug the cable going to the 10Gb switch, plug it back in, and it takes 30-45 seconds before the connection is up and functioning (e.g. the little network connection wheel keeps spinning). If I plug the system up to one of our 1Gb switches it takes about 10 seconds.

    – Kevin Vasko
    9 hours ago











  • The "little network connection wheel" is a host feature. Check out the switch LED/status instead.

    – Zac67
    9 hours ago



















  • Not enough information. Could it be spanning tree that causing your issue?

    – Ron Trunk
    9 hours ago











  • Logging in is host-specific which is off-topic here. You need to add details on when the link LED comes on (physical layer) and when data transfer starts (data link layer, check switch port status).

    – Zac67
    9 hours ago













  • @RonTrunk As in configuring the switch for spanning tree? Or are you asking if I have loops in the network? If it is the latter, it does not have loops in the network. This is a diagram of the network. imgur.com/HpBrAnU

    – Kevin Vasko
    9 hours ago











  • @Zac67 I'm not talking about logging in. I'm talking about how long it takes between when the connection is marked active and usable, I was using the login scenario as an example. In Ubuntu I can unplug the cable going to the 10Gb switch, plug it back in, and it takes 30-45 seconds before the connection is up and functioning (e.g. the little network connection wheel keeps spinning). If I plug the system up to one of our 1Gb switches it takes about 10 seconds.

    – Kevin Vasko
    9 hours ago











  • The "little network connection wheel" is a host feature. Check out the switch LED/status instead.

    – Zac67
    9 hours ago

















Not enough information. Could it be spanning tree that causing your issue?

– Ron Trunk
9 hours ago





Not enough information. Could it be spanning tree that causing your issue?

– Ron Trunk
9 hours ago













Logging in is host-specific which is off-topic here. You need to add details on when the link LED comes on (physical layer) and when data transfer starts (data link layer, check switch port status).

– Zac67
9 hours ago







Logging in is host-specific which is off-topic here. You need to add details on when the link LED comes on (physical layer) and when data transfer starts (data link layer, check switch port status).

– Zac67
9 hours ago















@RonTrunk As in configuring the switch for spanning tree? Or are you asking if I have loops in the network? If it is the latter, it does not have loops in the network. This is a diagram of the network. imgur.com/HpBrAnU

– Kevin Vasko
9 hours ago





@RonTrunk As in configuring the switch for spanning tree? Or are you asking if I have loops in the network? If it is the latter, it does not have loops in the network. This is a diagram of the network. imgur.com/HpBrAnU

– Kevin Vasko
9 hours ago













@Zac67 I'm not talking about logging in. I'm talking about how long it takes between when the connection is marked active and usable, I was using the login scenario as an example. In Ubuntu I can unplug the cable going to the 10Gb switch, plug it back in, and it takes 30-45 seconds before the connection is up and functioning (e.g. the little network connection wheel keeps spinning). If I plug the system up to one of our 1Gb switches it takes about 10 seconds.

– Kevin Vasko
9 hours ago





@Zac67 I'm not talking about logging in. I'm talking about how long it takes between when the connection is marked active and usable, I was using the login scenario as an example. In Ubuntu I can unplug the cable going to the 10Gb switch, plug it back in, and it takes 30-45 seconds before the connection is up and functioning (e.g. the little network connection wheel keeps spinning). If I plug the system up to one of our 1Gb switches it takes about 10 seconds.

– Kevin Vasko
9 hours ago













The "little network connection wheel" is a host feature. Check out the switch LED/status instead.

– Zac67
9 hours ago





The "little network connection wheel" is a host feature. Check out the switch LED/status instead.

– Zac67
9 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4














If you have a switch with a default configuration, spanning tree will block ports when they come up until the forwarding timer expires.



You can configure portfast on ports that have end hosts on them to allow spanning-tree to put the ports immediately into forwarding mode.






share|improve this answer
























  • A true evergreen in networking: portfast trouble. Here probably in its NX-OS guise as "spanning tree port type edge" if the port is in access mode (single VLAN untagged), respevtively as "spanning tree port type edge trunk" if the port is 802.1q with tagging towards the host. You wouldn't believe how many networks run without it, esepecially the without the latter variety...

    – Marc 'netztier' Luethi
    6 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "496"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Kevin Vasko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f56108%2fextremely-long-time-to-establish-network-link-with-nexus-n9k-c9372-px-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














If you have a switch with a default configuration, spanning tree will block ports when they come up until the forwarding timer expires.



You can configure portfast on ports that have end hosts on them to allow spanning-tree to put the ports immediately into forwarding mode.






share|improve this answer
























  • A true evergreen in networking: portfast trouble. Here probably in its NX-OS guise as "spanning tree port type edge" if the port is in access mode (single VLAN untagged), respevtively as "spanning tree port type edge trunk" if the port is 802.1q with tagging towards the host. You wouldn't believe how many networks run without it, esepecially the without the latter variety...

    – Marc 'netztier' Luethi
    6 hours ago
















4














If you have a switch with a default configuration, spanning tree will block ports when they come up until the forwarding timer expires.



You can configure portfast on ports that have end hosts on them to allow spanning-tree to put the ports immediately into forwarding mode.






share|improve this answer
























  • A true evergreen in networking: portfast trouble. Here probably in its NX-OS guise as "spanning tree port type edge" if the port is in access mode (single VLAN untagged), respevtively as "spanning tree port type edge trunk" if the port is 802.1q with tagging towards the host. You wouldn't believe how many networks run without it, esepecially the without the latter variety...

    – Marc 'netztier' Luethi
    6 hours ago














4












4








4







If you have a switch with a default configuration, spanning tree will block ports when they come up until the forwarding timer expires.



You can configure portfast on ports that have end hosts on them to allow spanning-tree to put the ports immediately into forwarding mode.






share|improve this answer













If you have a switch with a default configuration, spanning tree will block ports when they come up until the forwarding timer expires.



You can configure portfast on ports that have end hosts on them to allow spanning-tree to put the ports immediately into forwarding mode.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 9 hours ago









Ron TrunkRon Trunk

35.2k33372




35.2k33372













  • A true evergreen in networking: portfast trouble. Here probably in its NX-OS guise as "spanning tree port type edge" if the port is in access mode (single VLAN untagged), respevtively as "spanning tree port type edge trunk" if the port is 802.1q with tagging towards the host. You wouldn't believe how many networks run without it, esepecially the without the latter variety...

    – Marc 'netztier' Luethi
    6 hours ago



















  • A true evergreen in networking: portfast trouble. Here probably in its NX-OS guise as "spanning tree port type edge" if the port is in access mode (single VLAN untagged), respevtively as "spanning tree port type edge trunk" if the port is 802.1q with tagging towards the host. You wouldn't believe how many networks run without it, esepecially the without the latter variety...

    – Marc 'netztier' Luethi
    6 hours ago

















A true evergreen in networking: portfast trouble. Here probably in its NX-OS guise as "spanning tree port type edge" if the port is in access mode (single VLAN untagged), respevtively as "spanning tree port type edge trunk" if the port is 802.1q with tagging towards the host. You wouldn't believe how many networks run without it, esepecially the without the latter variety...

– Marc 'netztier' Luethi
6 hours ago





A true evergreen in networking: portfast trouble. Here probably in its NX-OS guise as "spanning tree port type edge" if the port is in access mode (single VLAN untagged), respevtively as "spanning tree port type edge trunk" if the port is 802.1q with tagging towards the host. You wouldn't believe how many networks run without it, esepecially the without the latter variety...

– Marc 'netztier' Luethi
6 hours ago










Kevin Vasko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Kevin Vasko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Kevin Vasko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Kevin Vasko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Network Engineering Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f56108%2fextremely-long-time-to-establish-network-link-with-nexus-n9k-c9372-px-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Statuo de Libereco

Tanganjiko

Liste der Baudenkmäler in Enneberg