Where does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?












2















Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.



In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):




הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן



The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].




Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?






shulchan-aruch







share|improve this question

























  • I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

    – Dr. Shmuel
    2 days ago






  • 2





    There are dozens of such examples

    – Double AA♦
    2 days ago











  • In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

    – Al Berko
    yesterday











  • Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

    – Al Berko
    yesterday
















2















Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.



In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):




הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן



The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].




Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?






shulchan-aruch







share|improve this question

























  • I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

    – Dr. Shmuel
    2 days ago






  • 2





    There are dozens of such examples

    – Double AA♦
    2 days ago











  • In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

    – Al Berko
    yesterday











  • Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

    – Al Berko
    yesterday














2












2








2








Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.



In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):




הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן



The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].




Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?






shulchan-aruch







share|improve this question
















Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.



In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):




הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן



The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].




Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?






shulchan-aruch




shulchan-aruch






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Al Berko

6,5371529




6,5371529










asked 2 days ago









DonielFDonielF

17.1k12690




17.1k12690













  • I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

    – Dr. Shmuel
    2 days ago






  • 2





    There are dozens of such examples

    – Double AA♦
    2 days ago











  • In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

    – Al Berko
    yesterday











  • Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

    – Al Berko
    yesterday



















  • I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

    – Dr. Shmuel
    2 days ago






  • 2





    There are dozens of such examples

    – Double AA♦
    2 days ago











  • In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

    – Al Berko
    yesterday











  • Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

    – Al Berko
    yesterday

















I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

– Dr. Shmuel
2 days ago





I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

– Dr. Shmuel
2 days ago




2




2





There are dozens of such examples

– Double AA♦
2 days ago





There are dozens of such examples

– Double AA♦
2 days ago













In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

– Al Berko
yesterday





In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

– Al Berko
yesterday













Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

– Al Berko
yesterday





Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

– Al Berko
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















7














It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.






share|improve this answer































    5














    Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




    הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:







    share|improve this answer
























    • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

      – user6591
      2 days ago













    • First thing to pop on my mind

      – sam
      2 days ago











    • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

      – Double AA♦
      2 days ago






    • 1





      @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

      – user6591
      2 days ago



















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7














    It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



    In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




    סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




    In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




    ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




    In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




    הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




    O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




    והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




    There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.






    share|improve this answer




























      7














      It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



      In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




      סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




      In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




      ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




      In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




      הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




      O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




      והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




      There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.






      share|improve this answer


























        7












        7








        7







        It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



        In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




        סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




        In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




        ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




        In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




        הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




        O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




        והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




        There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.






        share|improve this answer













        It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



        In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




        סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




        In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




        ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




        In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




        הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




        O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




        והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




        There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        AlexAlex

        23.5k157134




        23.5k157134























            5














            Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




            הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:







            share|improve this answer
























            • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

              – user6591
              2 days ago













            • First thing to pop on my mind

              – sam
              2 days ago











            • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

              – Double AA♦
              2 days ago






            • 1





              @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

              – user6591
              2 days ago
















            5














            Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




            הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:







            share|improve this answer
























            • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

              – user6591
              2 days ago













            • First thing to pop on my mind

              – sam
              2 days ago











            • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

              – Double AA♦
              2 days ago






            • 1





              @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

              – user6591
              2 days ago














            5












            5








            5







            Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




            הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:







            share|improve this answer













            Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




            הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:








            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 days ago









            user6591user6591

            25.8k12758




            25.8k12758













            • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

              – user6591
              2 days ago













            • First thing to pop on my mind

              – sam
              2 days ago











            • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

              – Double AA♦
              2 days ago






            • 1





              @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

              – user6591
              2 days ago



















            • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

              – user6591
              2 days ago













            • First thing to pop on my mind

              – sam
              2 days ago











            • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

              – Double AA♦
              2 days ago






            • 1





              @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

              – user6591
              2 days ago

















            This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

            – user6591
            2 days ago







            This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

            – user6591
            2 days ago















            First thing to pop on my mind

            – sam
            2 days ago





            First thing to pop on my mind

            – sam
            2 days ago













            There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

            – Double AA♦
            2 days ago





            There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

            – Double AA♦
            2 days ago




            1




            1





            @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

            – user6591
            2 days ago





            @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

            – user6591
            2 days ago



            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Reichsarbeitsdienst

            Image
            Hausflagge des RAD mit Symbol Staatssekretär Konstantin Hierl schreitet auf dem Tempelhofer Feld die Front des RAD ab. Maifeier Berlin, 1. Mai 1934 RAD beim Straßenbau, 1936 RAD-Parade: „Der große Aufmarsch der 38.000 Arbeits­dienst­männer vor dem Führer auf dem Zeppelin­feld“, „Reichs­partei­tag der Arbeit“. Männer des RAD mit ge­schulter­tem Spaten vor Hitler im Auto, 6.–13. Sep. 1937 Reichsparteitag Nürnberg, Arbeits­dienst-Zeltlager mit Arbeitsmaiden, August 1939 Paramilitärischer Aufmarsch des Ar­beits­dienstes, ca. 1940 Vormaliges RAD-Lager (4/224), Ober­mill­statt, um 1940 erbaut als Quartier für junge, zum Arbeits­dienst eingezogene Frau­en, auch Bund Deutscher Mädel (BDM), die bei den Ober­mill­stätter Bauern ein­gesetzt waren, 1950 Der Reichsarbeitsdienst ( RAD ) war eine Organisation im nationalsozialistischen Deutschen Reich. Das Gesetz für den Reichsarbeitsdienst wurde am 26. Juni 1935 erlassen. § 1 (2) lautete: „Alle jungen Deutschen beider...
            Read more

            Tanganjiko

            Image
            Lago Tanganjiko Situo centra Afriko Ĉefaj fontoj Kalambo, Lufuko, Malagarasi kaj Ruzizi Ĉefaj elfluoj Lukugo Setlejoj Bujumbura, Kalemie Datenoj Koordinatoj 6°  S , 30°  O -6.3827777777778 29.615 782 Koordinatoj: 6°  S , 30°  O DEC Supermara alteco 782 m Surfaca areo 32 893 km² f5 Maksimuma longo 673 km f6 Maksimuma larĝo 72 km f7 Akva volumeno 18.900 km³ dep1 f8 Maksimuma profundo 1470 m f10 Averaĝa profundo 570 m f11 v   •   d   •   r Mapo de la lago Tanganjiko estas lago en orienta Afriko, inter Burundo, Kongo Kinŝasa, Tanzanio kaj Zambio. Ĝi apartenas al la Granda Rifto kaj estas unu el la Afrikaj Grandaj Lagoj. Tanzanio (46%) kaj DRK (40%) havas la majoritaton de la lago. Ĝi havas longon de 673 km, areon de ĉ. 32.900 km² kaj maksimuman profundon taksatan je 1470 metroj; pro tiu ĉi granda profundo ankaŭ ĝia volumeno estas sufiĉe granda, 18.900 km³. Oni konsi...
            Read more

            Norda sulo

            Image
            Norda sulo Biologia klasado Regno: Animaloj Animalia Filumo: Ĥorduloj Chordata Klaso: Birdoj Aves Ordo: Pelikanoformaj Pelecaniformes Familio: Suledoj Sulidae Genro: Moro Morus Specio: M. bassanus Dunomo Morus bassanus Linnaeus, 1758 Konserva statuso Konserva statuso: Malplej zorgiga Vivejo de la norda sulo Aliaj Vikimediaj projektoj Sistematiko en Vikispecioj Komunejo pri Norda sulo v   •   d   •   r Uzinte rubaĵojn kiel nestomaterialo. La Norda sulo ( Morus bassanus aŭ Sula bassana ), estas granda marbirdo (ĝis 90 cm, nome la plej granda sulo) de la familio de Suledoj kaj genro Morus , diferencaj de aliaj suloj per pli svelta kaj flaveca kapo. En ties mondoparto ĝi estas nomata ankaŭ simple kiel Sulo . Ĝi estas mara birdo kiu ripozas surtere nur por nestumi kaj idozorgadi; ĝi reproduktiĝas en kolonioj de ĝis 35,000 paroj ambaŭflanke de Norda Atlanti...
            Read more