Salary overtime and PTO on the same week [on hold]
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I just want to know if there is anything that I can specifically reference online with regards to the following.
Employee is salaried. Employee worked over 140 hours in a single week: over 30 hour shift followed by 20 hour shift where employee had 6 hours of sleep between shifts during "expected work hours".
Employee manual states that deviation from expected work hours requires PTO, and thus was forced to take PTO in order to sleep.
Apparently United States allows severe abuse of Salary employees as everyone knows, but I have a hard time imagining there isn't something that protects the employee from that.
salary human-resources employees overtime law
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by Abigail, IDrinkandIKnowThings, Dan Pichelman, gnat, sf02 11 hours ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address only a specific company or position are of limited use to future visitors. Questions seeking legal advice should be directed to legal professionals. For more information, click here." – Abigail, IDrinkandIKnowThings, Dan Pichelman, gnat, sf02
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
I just want to know if there is anything that I can specifically reference online with regards to the following.
Employee is salaried. Employee worked over 140 hours in a single week: over 30 hour shift followed by 20 hour shift where employee had 6 hours of sleep between shifts during "expected work hours".
Employee manual states that deviation from expected work hours requires PTO, and thus was forced to take PTO in order to sleep.
Apparently United States allows severe abuse of Salary employees as everyone knows, but I have a hard time imagining there isn't something that protects the employee from that.
salary human-resources employees overtime law
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by Abigail, IDrinkandIKnowThings, Dan Pichelman, gnat, sf02 11 hours ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address only a specific company or position are of limited use to future visitors. Questions seeking legal advice should be directed to legal professionals. For more information, click here." – Abigail, IDrinkandIKnowThings, Dan Pichelman, gnat, sf02
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
I voted to close. You're asking for legal advice, which is considered off-topic.
– Abigail
11 hours ago
What state are you in?
– DJClayworth
11 hours ago
3
The person isn't a medical resident or something like that, are they?
– mkennedy
10 hours ago
There are only 168 hours in a calendar week, remind me not to work for this company
– cdkMoose
10 hours ago
1
If this question is legit (and I have a hard time believing its real), then this company is the biggest bunch of idiots I've ever heard of. They managed to get a person dedicated enough to work 30 straight hours, crash for 6, and then pull another 20 hours? And instead of lavishly praising them for a frankly ridiculous amount of effort... they tried to punish them on a technicality?
– Kevin
8 hours ago
add a comment |
I just want to know if there is anything that I can specifically reference online with regards to the following.
Employee is salaried. Employee worked over 140 hours in a single week: over 30 hour shift followed by 20 hour shift where employee had 6 hours of sleep between shifts during "expected work hours".
Employee manual states that deviation from expected work hours requires PTO, and thus was forced to take PTO in order to sleep.
Apparently United States allows severe abuse of Salary employees as everyone knows, but I have a hard time imagining there isn't something that protects the employee from that.
salary human-resources employees overtime law
New contributor
I just want to know if there is anything that I can specifically reference online with regards to the following.
Employee is salaried. Employee worked over 140 hours in a single week: over 30 hour shift followed by 20 hour shift where employee had 6 hours of sleep between shifts during "expected work hours".
Employee manual states that deviation from expected work hours requires PTO, and thus was forced to take PTO in order to sleep.
Apparently United States allows severe abuse of Salary employees as everyone knows, but I have a hard time imagining there isn't something that protects the employee from that.
salary human-resources employees overtime law
salary human-resources employees overtime law
New contributor
New contributor
edited 5 hours ago
DarkCygnus
39.7k1887169
39.7k1887169
New contributor
asked 11 hours ago
dunpealslyrdunpealslyr
122
122
New contributor
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by Abigail, IDrinkandIKnowThings, Dan Pichelman, gnat, sf02 11 hours ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address only a specific company or position are of limited use to future visitors. Questions seeking legal advice should be directed to legal professionals. For more information, click here." – Abigail, IDrinkandIKnowThings, Dan Pichelman, gnat, sf02
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by Abigail, IDrinkandIKnowThings, Dan Pichelman, gnat, sf02 11 hours ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address only a specific company or position are of limited use to future visitors. Questions seeking legal advice should be directed to legal professionals. For more information, click here." – Abigail, IDrinkandIKnowThings, Dan Pichelman, gnat, sf02
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
I voted to close. You're asking for legal advice, which is considered off-topic.
– Abigail
11 hours ago
What state are you in?
– DJClayworth
11 hours ago
3
The person isn't a medical resident or something like that, are they?
– mkennedy
10 hours ago
There are only 168 hours in a calendar week, remind me not to work for this company
– cdkMoose
10 hours ago
1
If this question is legit (and I have a hard time believing its real), then this company is the biggest bunch of idiots I've ever heard of. They managed to get a person dedicated enough to work 30 straight hours, crash for 6, and then pull another 20 hours? And instead of lavishly praising them for a frankly ridiculous amount of effort... they tried to punish them on a technicality?
– Kevin
8 hours ago
add a comment |
I voted to close. You're asking for legal advice, which is considered off-topic.
– Abigail
11 hours ago
What state are you in?
– DJClayworth
11 hours ago
3
The person isn't a medical resident or something like that, are they?
– mkennedy
10 hours ago
There are only 168 hours in a calendar week, remind me not to work for this company
– cdkMoose
10 hours ago
1
If this question is legit (and I have a hard time believing its real), then this company is the biggest bunch of idiots I've ever heard of. They managed to get a person dedicated enough to work 30 straight hours, crash for 6, and then pull another 20 hours? And instead of lavishly praising them for a frankly ridiculous amount of effort... they tried to punish them on a technicality?
– Kevin
8 hours ago
I voted to close. You're asking for legal advice, which is considered off-topic.
– Abigail
11 hours ago
I voted to close. You're asking for legal advice, which is considered off-topic.
– Abigail
11 hours ago
What state are you in?
– DJClayworth
11 hours ago
What state are you in?
– DJClayworth
11 hours ago
3
3
The person isn't a medical resident or something like that, are they?
– mkennedy
10 hours ago
The person isn't a medical resident or something like that, are they?
– mkennedy
10 hours ago
There are only 168 hours in a calendar week, remind me not to work for this company
– cdkMoose
10 hours ago
There are only 168 hours in a calendar week, remind me not to work for this company
– cdkMoose
10 hours ago
1
1
If this question is legit (and I have a hard time believing its real), then this company is the biggest bunch of idiots I've ever heard of. They managed to get a person dedicated enough to work 30 straight hours, crash for 6, and then pull another 20 hours? And instead of lavishly praising them for a frankly ridiculous amount of effort... they tried to punish them on a technicality?
– Kevin
8 hours ago
If this question is legit (and I have a hard time believing its real), then this company is the biggest bunch of idiots I've ever heard of. They managed to get a person dedicated enough to work 30 straight hours, crash for 6, and then pull another 20 hours? And instead of lavishly praising them for a frankly ridiculous amount of effort... they tried to punish them on a technicality?
– Kevin
8 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
PTO is the wrong thing to be worried about here. It's kind of like someone running over your dog and then focusing on how it messed up the edging on your lawn.
There is basically no reason for a salaried employee to ever consent to working 30 hours straight, let alone come back to work another 20 hours shortly after that. I'd recommend setting boundaries with the boss/company about the length of a shift and similar things. However, if the situation has deteriorated to where someone works 50 hours over 2-3 days and the company complains about you sleeping, then you should probably just leave; it's not realistic to believe that is going to improve to a healthy situation.
In terms of legal protection, salaried employees in most states are not signing their life over, but instead agreeing to work around 40 hours a week. In many cases there are complaints you can file, and or grounds where you can sue. In all legal things, save written communication, write down verbal conversations, and consult a local lawyer.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
PTO is the wrong thing to be worried about here. It's kind of like someone running over your dog and then focusing on how it messed up the edging on your lawn.
There is basically no reason for a salaried employee to ever consent to working 30 hours straight, let alone come back to work another 20 hours shortly after that. I'd recommend setting boundaries with the boss/company about the length of a shift and similar things. However, if the situation has deteriorated to where someone works 50 hours over 2-3 days and the company complains about you sleeping, then you should probably just leave; it's not realistic to believe that is going to improve to a healthy situation.
In terms of legal protection, salaried employees in most states are not signing their life over, but instead agreeing to work around 40 hours a week. In many cases there are complaints you can file, and or grounds where you can sue. In all legal things, save written communication, write down verbal conversations, and consult a local lawyer.
add a comment |
PTO is the wrong thing to be worried about here. It's kind of like someone running over your dog and then focusing on how it messed up the edging on your lawn.
There is basically no reason for a salaried employee to ever consent to working 30 hours straight, let alone come back to work another 20 hours shortly after that. I'd recommend setting boundaries with the boss/company about the length of a shift and similar things. However, if the situation has deteriorated to where someone works 50 hours over 2-3 days and the company complains about you sleeping, then you should probably just leave; it's not realistic to believe that is going to improve to a healthy situation.
In terms of legal protection, salaried employees in most states are not signing their life over, but instead agreeing to work around 40 hours a week. In many cases there are complaints you can file, and or grounds where you can sue. In all legal things, save written communication, write down verbal conversations, and consult a local lawyer.
add a comment |
PTO is the wrong thing to be worried about here. It's kind of like someone running over your dog and then focusing on how it messed up the edging on your lawn.
There is basically no reason for a salaried employee to ever consent to working 30 hours straight, let alone come back to work another 20 hours shortly after that. I'd recommend setting boundaries with the boss/company about the length of a shift and similar things. However, if the situation has deteriorated to where someone works 50 hours over 2-3 days and the company complains about you sleeping, then you should probably just leave; it's not realistic to believe that is going to improve to a healthy situation.
In terms of legal protection, salaried employees in most states are not signing their life over, but instead agreeing to work around 40 hours a week. In many cases there are complaints you can file, and or grounds where you can sue. In all legal things, save written communication, write down verbal conversations, and consult a local lawyer.
PTO is the wrong thing to be worried about here. It's kind of like someone running over your dog and then focusing on how it messed up the edging on your lawn.
There is basically no reason for a salaried employee to ever consent to working 30 hours straight, let alone come back to work another 20 hours shortly after that. I'd recommend setting boundaries with the boss/company about the length of a shift and similar things. However, if the situation has deteriorated to where someone works 50 hours over 2-3 days and the company complains about you sleeping, then you should probably just leave; it's not realistic to believe that is going to improve to a healthy situation.
In terms of legal protection, salaried employees in most states are not signing their life over, but instead agreeing to work around 40 hours a week. In many cases there are complaints you can file, and or grounds where you can sue. In all legal things, save written communication, write down verbal conversations, and consult a local lawyer.
answered 11 hours ago
dbeerdbeer
8,86861829
8,86861829
add a comment |
add a comment |
I voted to close. You're asking for legal advice, which is considered off-topic.
– Abigail
11 hours ago
What state are you in?
– DJClayworth
11 hours ago
3
The person isn't a medical resident or something like that, are they?
– mkennedy
10 hours ago
There are only 168 hours in a calendar week, remind me not to work for this company
– cdkMoose
10 hours ago
1
If this question is legit (and I have a hard time believing its real), then this company is the biggest bunch of idiots I've ever heard of. They managed to get a person dedicated enough to work 30 straight hours, crash for 6, and then pull another 20 hours? And instead of lavishly praising them for a frankly ridiculous amount of effort... they tried to punish them on a technicality?
– Kevin
8 hours ago