What does M/F/D/V mean on a job application?
While filling out a job application, I noticed a small label designating M/F/D/V.
Is this important? What does this label mean?
applications terminology
add a comment |
While filling out a job application, I noticed a small label designating M/F/D/V.
Is this important? What does this label mean?
applications terminology
add a comment |
While filling out a job application, I noticed a small label designating M/F/D/V.
Is this important? What does this label mean?
applications terminology
While filling out a job application, I noticed a small label designating M/F/D/V.
Is this important? What does this label mean?
applications terminology
applications terminology
edited Sep 12 '17 at 14:41
Steven M. Vascellaro
asked Aug 8 '17 at 2:40
Steven M. VascellaroSteven M. Vascellaro
5241521
5241521
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
It refers to the employer being an equal opportunities employer.
mrefers to male (in some places also minority).
frefers to female.
drefers to disabled.
vrefers to veteran.
2
Is this for the US? would be good to add that tag
– user29055
Aug 8 '17 at 13:51
2
Does it exclude people not that are not m/f/d/v ?
– Quentin
Aug 8 '17 at 14:26
@Quentin I would assume not. If a company is ONLY hiring minorities, females, disabled people and veterans - admirable though that may be - it would probably make it difficult to find enough candidates to hire.
– Steve-O
Aug 8 '17 at 18:15
@Steve-O I thought so, but wanted to be sure. It is probably a cultural thing, in my country we would more likely see something like "we hire people regardless of gender/age/disabilities..." or "Job title wanted (male/female)". When something like the gender is specified (which is probably illegal), I would expect that only the applicant matching the requirement (e.g. females) would be considered.
– Quentin
Aug 9 '17 at 7:14
3
@Steve-O - "If a company is ONLY hiring minorities, females, disabled people and veterans - admirable though that may be" - seriously? Should one be discriminated against for their m/f/d/v status (that is, not being one of those)? Sounds backwards to me.
– horse hair
Sep 12 '17 at 18:50
|
show 1 more comment
I don't see that notation on postings as much as I used to. My understanding is it is an attempt to notify people they follow all US Government guidelines about non-discrimination against those categories of people. I've seen the M as either minority or male. F = female, D=disabled, V=veteran. Also, I think, government projects get extra points for having people from those categories employed. Its certainly not saying ONLY people from those categories will be hired, that would be discrimination just as much as saying they would not be hired for the position.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f96720%2fwhat-does-m-f-d-v-mean-on-a-job-application%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It refers to the employer being an equal opportunities employer.
mrefers to male (in some places also minority).
frefers to female.
drefers to disabled.
vrefers to veteran.
2
Is this for the US? would be good to add that tag
– user29055
Aug 8 '17 at 13:51
2
Does it exclude people not that are not m/f/d/v ?
– Quentin
Aug 8 '17 at 14:26
@Quentin I would assume not. If a company is ONLY hiring minorities, females, disabled people and veterans - admirable though that may be - it would probably make it difficult to find enough candidates to hire.
– Steve-O
Aug 8 '17 at 18:15
@Steve-O I thought so, but wanted to be sure. It is probably a cultural thing, in my country we would more likely see something like "we hire people regardless of gender/age/disabilities..." or "Job title wanted (male/female)". When something like the gender is specified (which is probably illegal), I would expect that only the applicant matching the requirement (e.g. females) would be considered.
– Quentin
Aug 9 '17 at 7:14
3
@Steve-O - "If a company is ONLY hiring minorities, females, disabled people and veterans - admirable though that may be" - seriously? Should one be discriminated against for their m/f/d/v status (that is, not being one of those)? Sounds backwards to me.
– horse hair
Sep 12 '17 at 18:50
|
show 1 more comment
It refers to the employer being an equal opportunities employer.
mrefers to male (in some places also minority).
frefers to female.
drefers to disabled.
vrefers to veteran.
2
Is this for the US? would be good to add that tag
– user29055
Aug 8 '17 at 13:51
2
Does it exclude people not that are not m/f/d/v ?
– Quentin
Aug 8 '17 at 14:26
@Quentin I would assume not. If a company is ONLY hiring minorities, females, disabled people and veterans - admirable though that may be - it would probably make it difficult to find enough candidates to hire.
– Steve-O
Aug 8 '17 at 18:15
@Steve-O I thought so, but wanted to be sure. It is probably a cultural thing, in my country we would more likely see something like "we hire people regardless of gender/age/disabilities..." or "Job title wanted (male/female)". When something like the gender is specified (which is probably illegal), I would expect that only the applicant matching the requirement (e.g. females) would be considered.
– Quentin
Aug 9 '17 at 7:14
3
@Steve-O - "If a company is ONLY hiring minorities, females, disabled people and veterans - admirable though that may be" - seriously? Should one be discriminated against for their m/f/d/v status (that is, not being one of those)? Sounds backwards to me.
– horse hair
Sep 12 '17 at 18:50
|
show 1 more comment
It refers to the employer being an equal opportunities employer.
mrefers to male (in some places also minority).
frefers to female.
drefers to disabled.
vrefers to veteran.
It refers to the employer being an equal opportunities employer.
mrefers to male (in some places also minority).
frefers to female.
drefers to disabled.
vrefers to veteran.
edited 4 mins ago
Stefan
31
31
answered Aug 8 '17 at 3:17
MooMoo
7,11651926
7,11651926
2
Is this for the US? would be good to add that tag
– user29055
Aug 8 '17 at 13:51
2
Does it exclude people not that are not m/f/d/v ?
– Quentin
Aug 8 '17 at 14:26
@Quentin I would assume not. If a company is ONLY hiring minorities, females, disabled people and veterans - admirable though that may be - it would probably make it difficult to find enough candidates to hire.
– Steve-O
Aug 8 '17 at 18:15
@Steve-O I thought so, but wanted to be sure. It is probably a cultural thing, in my country we would more likely see something like "we hire people regardless of gender/age/disabilities..." or "Job title wanted (male/female)". When something like the gender is specified (which is probably illegal), I would expect that only the applicant matching the requirement (e.g. females) would be considered.
– Quentin
Aug 9 '17 at 7:14
3
@Steve-O - "If a company is ONLY hiring minorities, females, disabled people and veterans - admirable though that may be" - seriously? Should one be discriminated against for their m/f/d/v status (that is, not being one of those)? Sounds backwards to me.
– horse hair
Sep 12 '17 at 18:50
|
show 1 more comment
2
Is this for the US? would be good to add that tag
– user29055
Aug 8 '17 at 13:51
2
Does it exclude people not that are not m/f/d/v ?
– Quentin
Aug 8 '17 at 14:26
@Quentin I would assume not. If a company is ONLY hiring minorities, females, disabled people and veterans - admirable though that may be - it would probably make it difficult to find enough candidates to hire.
– Steve-O
Aug 8 '17 at 18:15
@Steve-O I thought so, but wanted to be sure. It is probably a cultural thing, in my country we would more likely see something like "we hire people regardless of gender/age/disabilities..." or "Job title wanted (male/female)". When something like the gender is specified (which is probably illegal), I would expect that only the applicant matching the requirement (e.g. females) would be considered.
– Quentin
Aug 9 '17 at 7:14
3
@Steve-O - "If a company is ONLY hiring minorities, females, disabled people and veterans - admirable though that may be" - seriously? Should one be discriminated against for their m/f/d/v status (that is, not being one of those)? Sounds backwards to me.
– horse hair
Sep 12 '17 at 18:50
2
2
Is this for the US? would be good to add that tag
– user29055
Aug 8 '17 at 13:51
Is this for the US? would be good to add that tag
– user29055
Aug 8 '17 at 13:51
2
2
Does it exclude people not that are not m/f/d/v ?
– Quentin
Aug 8 '17 at 14:26
Does it exclude people not that are not m/f/d/v ?
– Quentin
Aug 8 '17 at 14:26
@Quentin I would assume not. If a company is ONLY hiring minorities, females, disabled people and veterans - admirable though that may be - it would probably make it difficult to find enough candidates to hire.
– Steve-O
Aug 8 '17 at 18:15
@Quentin I would assume not. If a company is ONLY hiring minorities, females, disabled people and veterans - admirable though that may be - it would probably make it difficult to find enough candidates to hire.
– Steve-O
Aug 8 '17 at 18:15
@Steve-O I thought so, but wanted to be sure. It is probably a cultural thing, in my country we would more likely see something like "we hire people regardless of gender/age/disabilities..." or "Job title wanted (male/female)". When something like the gender is specified (which is probably illegal), I would expect that only the applicant matching the requirement (e.g. females) would be considered.
– Quentin
Aug 9 '17 at 7:14
@Steve-O I thought so, but wanted to be sure. It is probably a cultural thing, in my country we would more likely see something like "we hire people regardless of gender/age/disabilities..." or "Job title wanted (male/female)". When something like the gender is specified (which is probably illegal), I would expect that only the applicant matching the requirement (e.g. females) would be considered.
– Quentin
Aug 9 '17 at 7:14
3
3
@Steve-O - "If a company is ONLY hiring minorities, females, disabled people and veterans - admirable though that may be" - seriously? Should one be discriminated against for their m/f/d/v status (that is, not being one of those)? Sounds backwards to me.
– horse hair
Sep 12 '17 at 18:50
@Steve-O - "If a company is ONLY hiring minorities, females, disabled people and veterans - admirable though that may be" - seriously? Should one be discriminated against for their m/f/d/v status (that is, not being one of those)? Sounds backwards to me.
– horse hair
Sep 12 '17 at 18:50
|
show 1 more comment
I don't see that notation on postings as much as I used to. My understanding is it is an attempt to notify people they follow all US Government guidelines about non-discrimination against those categories of people. I've seen the M as either minority or male. F = female, D=disabled, V=veteran. Also, I think, government projects get extra points for having people from those categories employed. Its certainly not saying ONLY people from those categories will be hired, that would be discrimination just as much as saying they would not be hired for the position.
add a comment |
I don't see that notation on postings as much as I used to. My understanding is it is an attempt to notify people they follow all US Government guidelines about non-discrimination against those categories of people. I've seen the M as either minority or male. F = female, D=disabled, V=veteran. Also, I think, government projects get extra points for having people from those categories employed. Its certainly not saying ONLY people from those categories will be hired, that would be discrimination just as much as saying they would not be hired for the position.
add a comment |
I don't see that notation on postings as much as I used to. My understanding is it is an attempt to notify people they follow all US Government guidelines about non-discrimination against those categories of people. I've seen the M as either minority or male. F = female, D=disabled, V=veteran. Also, I think, government projects get extra points for having people from those categories employed. Its certainly not saying ONLY people from those categories will be hired, that would be discrimination just as much as saying they would not be hired for the position.
I don't see that notation on postings as much as I used to. My understanding is it is an attempt to notify people they follow all US Government guidelines about non-discrimination against those categories of people. I've seen the M as either minority or male. F = female, D=disabled, V=veteran. Also, I think, government projects get extra points for having people from those categories employed. Its certainly not saying ONLY people from those categories will be hired, that would be discrimination just as much as saying they would not be hired for the position.
answered Aug 9 '17 at 17:23
bluegreenbluegreen
66018
66018
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f96720%2fwhat-does-m-f-d-v-mean-on-a-job-application%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown