Which fixes from mathtools were merged to the AMS packages already?
mathtools aims to fix bugs and problems with the AMS package set.
Quote from the AMS site http://www.ams.org/publications/authors/tex/amslatex:
In 2016, LuaTeX version 1 was released, and attempts to use amsmath with LuaLaTeX would fail. To address this problem most effectively, responsibility for maintenance of amsmath was transferred to the LaTeX Project, and the authoritative version of amsmath is now on CTAN and in TeX Live.
Which fix has made it into the AMS package already?
Can the LaTeX Project merge the fixes to amsmath?
amsmath mathtools bugs
add a comment |
mathtools aims to fix bugs and problems with the AMS package set.
Quote from the AMS site http://www.ams.org/publications/authors/tex/amslatex:
In 2016, LuaTeX version 1 was released, and attempts to use amsmath with LuaLaTeX would fail. To address this problem most effectively, responsibility for maintenance of amsmath was transferred to the LaTeX Project, and the authoritative version of amsmath is now on CTAN and in TeX Live.
Which fix has made it into the AMS package already?
Can the LaTeX Project merge the fixes to amsmath?
amsmath mathtools bugs
add a comment |
mathtools aims to fix bugs and problems with the AMS package set.
Quote from the AMS site http://www.ams.org/publications/authors/tex/amslatex:
In 2016, LuaTeX version 1 was released, and attempts to use amsmath with LuaLaTeX would fail. To address this problem most effectively, responsibility for maintenance of amsmath was transferred to the LaTeX Project, and the authoritative version of amsmath is now on CTAN and in TeX Live.
Which fix has made it into the AMS package already?
Can the LaTeX Project merge the fixes to amsmath?
amsmath mathtools bugs
mathtools aims to fix bugs and problems with the AMS package set.
Quote from the AMS site http://www.ams.org/publications/authors/tex/amslatex:
In 2016, LuaTeX version 1 was released, and attempts to use amsmath with LuaLaTeX would fail. To address this problem most effectively, responsibility for maintenance of amsmath was transferred to the LaTeX Project, and the authoritative version of amsmath is now on CTAN and in TeX Live.
Which fix has made it into the AMS package already?
Can the LaTeX Project merge the fixes to amsmath?
amsmath mathtools bugs
amsmath mathtools bugs
asked 30 mins ago
Jonas SteinJonas Stein
3,36642746
3,36642746
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Your question is really two questions. The original adjustments for luatex were done first in amsmath
then communicated to the mathtools
maintainers to incorporate there, similarly the fix to not need !
before aligned
.
mathtools
has some extensions and fixes to amsmath
and there is a mid to long term aim to incorporate some of them back but mostly that's not done yet. As always the main issues are around document compatibility rather than difficulty in actually making the change.
You can see all the changes made since we picked up amsmath
here
https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/commits/master/required/amsmath
Or a more curated top level description of the changes here
https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/blob/master/required/amsmath/changes.txt
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f487514%2fwhich-fixes-from-mathtools-were-merged-to-the-ams-packages-already%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your question is really two questions. The original adjustments for luatex were done first in amsmath
then communicated to the mathtools
maintainers to incorporate there, similarly the fix to not need !
before aligned
.
mathtools
has some extensions and fixes to amsmath
and there is a mid to long term aim to incorporate some of them back but mostly that's not done yet. As always the main issues are around document compatibility rather than difficulty in actually making the change.
You can see all the changes made since we picked up amsmath
here
https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/commits/master/required/amsmath
Or a more curated top level description of the changes here
https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/blob/master/required/amsmath/changes.txt
add a comment |
Your question is really two questions. The original adjustments for luatex were done first in amsmath
then communicated to the mathtools
maintainers to incorporate there, similarly the fix to not need !
before aligned
.
mathtools
has some extensions and fixes to amsmath
and there is a mid to long term aim to incorporate some of them back but mostly that's not done yet. As always the main issues are around document compatibility rather than difficulty in actually making the change.
You can see all the changes made since we picked up amsmath
here
https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/commits/master/required/amsmath
Or a more curated top level description of the changes here
https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/blob/master/required/amsmath/changes.txt
add a comment |
Your question is really two questions. The original adjustments for luatex were done first in amsmath
then communicated to the mathtools
maintainers to incorporate there, similarly the fix to not need !
before aligned
.
mathtools
has some extensions and fixes to amsmath
and there is a mid to long term aim to incorporate some of them back but mostly that's not done yet. As always the main issues are around document compatibility rather than difficulty in actually making the change.
You can see all the changes made since we picked up amsmath
here
https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/commits/master/required/amsmath
Or a more curated top level description of the changes here
https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/blob/master/required/amsmath/changes.txt
Your question is really two questions. The original adjustments for luatex were done first in amsmath
then communicated to the mathtools
maintainers to incorporate there, similarly the fix to not need !
before aligned
.
mathtools
has some extensions and fixes to amsmath
and there is a mid to long term aim to incorporate some of them back but mostly that's not done yet. As always the main issues are around document compatibility rather than difficulty in actually making the change.
You can see all the changes made since we picked up amsmath
here
https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/commits/master/required/amsmath
Or a more curated top level description of the changes here
https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/blob/master/required/amsmath/changes.txt
answered 17 mins ago
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
501k4211471897
501k4211471897
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f487514%2fwhich-fixes-from-mathtools-were-merged-to-the-ams-packages-already%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown