Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?












5












$begingroup$


A complexity class $mathbb{C}$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:



$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbb{C}$ $implies$ $A in mathbb{C}$



How would you go about proving this if $mathbb{C} = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.



Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Try using the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    Apr 6 at 19:09










  • $begingroup$
    @YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
    $endgroup$
    – Ankit Bahl
    Apr 6 at 20:06
















5












$begingroup$


A complexity class $mathbb{C}$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:



$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbb{C}$ $implies$ $A in mathbb{C}$



How would you go about proving this if $mathbb{C} = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.



Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Try using the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    Apr 6 at 19:09










  • $begingroup$
    @YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
    $endgroup$
    – Ankit Bahl
    Apr 6 at 20:06














5












5








5


0



$begingroup$


A complexity class $mathbb{C}$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:



$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbb{C}$ $implies$ $A in mathbb{C}$



How would you go about proving this if $mathbb{C} = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.



Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




A complexity class $mathbb{C}$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:



$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbb{C}$ $implies$ $A in mathbb{C}$



How would you go about proving this if $mathbb{C} = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.



Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$







complexity-theory






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Apr 6 at 19:02









Ankit BahlAnkit Bahl

964




964




New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Try using the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    Apr 6 at 19:09










  • $begingroup$
    @YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
    $endgroup$
    – Ankit Bahl
    Apr 6 at 20:06














  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Try using the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    Apr 6 at 19:09










  • $begingroup$
    @YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
    $endgroup$
    – Ankit Bahl
    Apr 6 at 20:06








4




4




$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 6 at 19:09




$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 6 at 19:09












$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
Apr 6 at 20:06




$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
Apr 6 at 20:06










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

I was able to figure it out. In case anyone (mans in ECE 406) was wondering:



$B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where $i$ is the input to $B$.



$A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and same for false case),



Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:



$A (i)$




  1. Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$

  2. Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$


This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.






share|cite|improve this answer










New contributor




Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "419"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106574%2fprove-that-np-is-closed-under-karp-reduction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7












    $begingroup$

    I was able to figure it out. In case anyone (mans in ECE 406) was wondering:



    $B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where $i$ is the input to $B$.



    $A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and same for false case),



    Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:



    $A (i)$




    1. Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$

    2. Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$


    This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.






    share|cite|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$


















      7












      $begingroup$

      I was able to figure it out. In case anyone (mans in ECE 406) was wondering:



      $B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where $i$ is the input to $B$.



      $A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and same for false case),



      Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:



      $A (i)$




      1. Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$

      2. Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$


      This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.






      share|cite|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$
















        7












        7








        7





        $begingroup$

        I was able to figure it out. In case anyone (mans in ECE 406) was wondering:



        $B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where $i$ is the input to $B$.



        $A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and same for false case),



        Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:



        $A (i)$




        1. Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$

        2. Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$


        This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.






        share|cite|improve this answer










        New contributor




        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$



        I was able to figure it out. In case anyone (mans in ECE 406) was wondering:



        $B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where $i$ is the input to $B$.



        $A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and same for false case),



        Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:



        $A (i)$




        1. Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$

        2. Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$


        This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.







        share|cite|improve this answer










        New contributor




        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 12 hours ago





















        New contributor




        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered Apr 6 at 20:05









        Ankit BahlAnkit Bahl

        964




        964




        New contributor




        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Ankit Bahl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






















            Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106574%2fprove-that-np-is-closed-under-karp-reduction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Statuo de Libereco

            Tanganjiko

            Liste der Baudenkmäler in Enneberg