Definite integral giving negative value as a result?












4












$begingroup$


I want to calculate definite integral



$$int_{-2}^{-1} frac{1}{x^2}e^{frac{1}{x}} dx = Omega$$



$$int frac{1}{x^2}e^{frac{1}{x}} dx=-e^{frac{1}{x}}+C$$



so:



$$Omega = [-e^{frac{1}{-2}}]-[-e^{frac{1}{-1}}]=-frac{1}{sqrt{e}} + frac{1}{e}$$



which is a negative value. I believe it should be positive.



What went wrong in the process?






calculus integration definite-integrals







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    How exactly did you go about calculating the antiderivative? Wolfram Alpha gives a much different result.
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Your antiderivative is completely incorrect: The derivative of $e^{1/x^2}$ is $e^{1/x^2} / (-x^3)$. The red flag that you found is indeed a correct one, and shows that your answer cannot be right. This is a good thing to check.
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks. I have fixed it now. I meant $int frac{1}{x^2} e^{frac{1}{x}}dx$.
    $endgroup$
    – weno
    yesterday








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    You flipped the interval's endpoints. $-2<-1$
    $endgroup$
    – mr_e_man
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    And just to confirm, taking account of @mr_e_man’s comment above, your work seems correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    yesterday
















4












$begingroup$


I want to calculate definite integral



$$int_{-2}^{-1} frac{1}{x^2}e^{frac{1}{x}} dx = Omega$$



$$int frac{1}{x^2}e^{frac{1}{x}} dx=-e^{frac{1}{x}}+C$$



so:



$$Omega = [-e^{frac{1}{-2}}]-[-e^{frac{1}{-1}}]=-frac{1}{sqrt{e}} + frac{1}{e}$$



which is a negative value. I believe it should be positive.



What went wrong in the process?






calculus integration definite-integrals







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    How exactly did you go about calculating the antiderivative? Wolfram Alpha gives a much different result.
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Your antiderivative is completely incorrect: The derivative of $e^{1/x^2}$ is $e^{1/x^2} / (-x^3)$. The red flag that you found is indeed a correct one, and shows that your answer cannot be right. This is a good thing to check.
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks. I have fixed it now. I meant $int frac{1}{x^2} e^{frac{1}{x}}dx$.
    $endgroup$
    – weno
    yesterday








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    You flipped the interval's endpoints. $-2<-1$
    $endgroup$
    – mr_e_man
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    And just to confirm, taking account of @mr_e_man’s comment above, your work seems correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    yesterday














4












4








4





$begingroup$


I want to calculate definite integral



$$int_{-2}^{-1} frac{1}{x^2}e^{frac{1}{x}} dx = Omega$$



$$int frac{1}{x^2}e^{frac{1}{x}} dx=-e^{frac{1}{x}}+C$$



so:



$$Omega = [-e^{frac{1}{-2}}]-[-e^{frac{1}{-1}}]=-frac{1}{sqrt{e}} + frac{1}{e}$$



which is a negative value. I believe it should be positive.



What went wrong in the process?






calculus integration definite-integrals







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I want to calculate definite integral



$$int_{-2}^{-1} frac{1}{x^2}e^{frac{1}{x}} dx = Omega$$



$$int frac{1}{x^2}e^{frac{1}{x}} dx=-e^{frac{1}{x}}+C$$



so:



$$Omega = [-e^{frac{1}{-2}}]-[-e^{frac{1}{-1}}]=-frac{1}{sqrt{e}} + frac{1}{e}$$



which is a negative value. I believe it should be positive.



What went wrong in the process?






calculus integration definite-integrals




calculus integration definite-integrals






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









Eevee Trainer

10k31740




10k31740










asked yesterday









wenoweno

39611




39611








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    How exactly did you go about calculating the antiderivative? Wolfram Alpha gives a much different result.
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Your antiderivative is completely incorrect: The derivative of $e^{1/x^2}$ is $e^{1/x^2} / (-x^3)$. The red flag that you found is indeed a correct one, and shows that your answer cannot be right. This is a good thing to check.
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks. I have fixed it now. I meant $int frac{1}{x^2} e^{frac{1}{x}}dx$.
    $endgroup$
    – weno
    yesterday








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    You flipped the interval's endpoints. $-2<-1$
    $endgroup$
    – mr_e_man
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    And just to confirm, taking account of @mr_e_man’s comment above, your work seems correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    yesterday














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    How exactly did you go about calculating the antiderivative? Wolfram Alpha gives a much different result.
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Your antiderivative is completely incorrect: The derivative of $e^{1/x^2}$ is $e^{1/x^2} / (-x^3)$. The red flag that you found is indeed a correct one, and shows that your answer cannot be right. This is a good thing to check.
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks. I have fixed it now. I meant $int frac{1}{x^2} e^{frac{1}{x}}dx$.
    $endgroup$
    – weno
    yesterday








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    You flipped the interval's endpoints. $-2<-1$
    $endgroup$
    – mr_e_man
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    And just to confirm, taking account of @mr_e_man’s comment above, your work seems correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    yesterday








2




2




$begingroup$
How exactly did you go about calculating the antiderivative? Wolfram Alpha gives a much different result.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
yesterday




$begingroup$
How exactly did you go about calculating the antiderivative? Wolfram Alpha gives a much different result.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
yesterday




2




2




$begingroup$
Your antiderivative is completely incorrect: The derivative of $e^{1/x^2}$ is $e^{1/x^2} / (-x^3)$. The red flag that you found is indeed a correct one, and shows that your answer cannot be right. This is a good thing to check.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
yesterday






$begingroup$
Your antiderivative is completely incorrect: The derivative of $e^{1/x^2}$ is $e^{1/x^2} / (-x^3)$. The red flag that you found is indeed a correct one, and shows that your answer cannot be right. This is a good thing to check.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
yesterday














$begingroup$
Thanks. I have fixed it now. I meant $int frac{1}{x^2} e^{frac{1}{x}}dx$.
$endgroup$
– weno
yesterday






$begingroup$
Thanks. I have fixed it now. I meant $int frac{1}{x^2} e^{frac{1}{x}}dx$.
$endgroup$
– weno
yesterday






5




5




$begingroup$
You flipped the interval's endpoints. $-2<-1$
$endgroup$
– mr_e_man
yesterday




$begingroup$
You flipped the interval's endpoints. $-2<-1$
$endgroup$
– mr_e_man
yesterday












$begingroup$
And just to confirm, taking account of @mr_e_man’s comment above, your work seems correct.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
yesterday




$begingroup$
And just to confirm, taking account of @mr_e_man’s comment above, your work seems correct.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

What you effectively did was swap the order of evaluation for the fundamental theorem of calculus. Recall:



$$int_a^b f(x)dx = F(b) - F(a)$$



when the antiderivative of $f$ is $F$. You instead have $F(a) - F(b)$ ($a=-2,b=-1$) in this case. The end result is merely a sign error - you have precisely the negative of the answer which you should expect.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3176540%2fdefinite-integral-giving-negative-value-as-a-result%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    What you effectively did was swap the order of evaluation for the fundamental theorem of calculus. Recall:



    $$int_a^b f(x)dx = F(b) - F(a)$$



    when the antiderivative of $f$ is $F$. You instead have $F(a) - F(b)$ ($a=-2,b=-1$) in this case. The end result is merely a sign error - you have precisely the negative of the answer which you should expect.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      What you effectively did was swap the order of evaluation for the fundamental theorem of calculus. Recall:



      $$int_a^b f(x)dx = F(b) - F(a)$$



      when the antiderivative of $f$ is $F$. You instead have $F(a) - F(b)$ ($a=-2,b=-1$) in this case. The end result is merely a sign error - you have precisely the negative of the answer which you should expect.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        What you effectively did was swap the order of evaluation for the fundamental theorem of calculus. Recall:



        $$int_a^b f(x)dx = F(b) - F(a)$$



        when the antiderivative of $f$ is $F$. You instead have $F(a) - F(b)$ ($a=-2,b=-1$) in this case. The end result is merely a sign error - you have precisely the negative of the answer which you should expect.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        What you effectively did was swap the order of evaluation for the fundamental theorem of calculus. Recall:



        $$int_a^b f(x)dx = F(b) - F(a)$$



        when the antiderivative of $f$ is $F$. You instead have $F(a) - F(b)$ ($a=-2,b=-1$) in this case. The end result is merely a sign error - you have precisely the negative of the answer which you should expect.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer

        10k31740




        10k31740






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3176540%2fdefinite-integral-giving-negative-value-as-a-result%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Statuo de Libereco

            Image
            Koordinatoj: 40°41′21″N 74°02′40″W   /   40.68917°N , 74.04444°U  / 40.68917; -74.04444  ( Statuo de Libereco ) Statuo de Libereco angle: Statue of Liberty statuo Statuo de Libereco de antaŭe Oficiala nomo: Liberty Enlightening the World Lando  Usono Ŝtato Novjorkio Regiono Novjorko Insulo Insulo de Libereco Situo Statuo de Libereco  - koordinatoj 40°41′21″N 74°02′40″W   /   40.68917°N , 74.04444°U  / 40.68917; -74.04444  ( Statuo de Libereco ) Alteco de statuo 46 m  - alteco kun soklo 93 m Pezo 205 000 kg (451 948 lb) Materialoj bronzo, ŝtalo Proponinto Gustave Eiffel  - skulptisto Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi  - proponinto de soklo Richard Morris Hunt  - kapo laŭ modelo de Isabella Eugenie Boyer Transdonita 4-an de julio 1886 Por publiko alirebla por publiko Horzono OT (UTC-5)  - somera tempo OT (UTC-4) Loko
            Read more

            Tanganjiko

            Image
            Lago Tanganjiko Situo centra Afriko Ĉefaj fontoj Kalambo, Lufuko, Malagarasi kaj Ruzizi Ĉefaj elfluoj Lukugo Setlejoj Bujumbura, Kalemie Datenoj Koordinatoj 6°  S , 30°  O -6.3827777777778 29.615 782 Koordinatoj: 6°  S , 30°  O DEC Supermara alteco 782 m Surfaca areo 32 893 km² f5 Maksimuma longo 673 km f6 Maksimuma larĝo 72 km f7 Akva volumeno 18.900 km³ dep1 f8 Maksimuma profundo 1470 m f10 Averaĝa profundo 570 m f11 v   •   d   •   r Mapo de la lago Tanganjiko estas lago en orienta Afriko, inter Burundo, Kongo Kinŝasa, Tanzanio kaj Zambio. Ĝi apartenas al la Granda Rifto kaj estas unu el la Afrikaj Grandaj Lagoj. Tanzanio (46%) kaj DRK (40%) havas la majoritaton de la lago. Ĝi havas longon de 673 km, areon de ĉ. 32.900 km² kaj maksimuman profundon taksatan je 1470 metroj; pro tiu ĉi granda profundo ankaŭ ĝia volumeno estas sufiĉe granda, 18.900 km³. Oni konsi
            Read more

            Liste der Baudenkmäler in Enneberg

            Image
            Die Liste der Baudenkmäler in Enneberg (ladinisch Mareo , italienisch Marebbe ) enthält die 36 als Baudenkmäler ausgewiesenen Objekte auf dem Gebiet der Gemeinde Enneberg in Südtirol. Basis ist das im Internet einsehbare offizielle Verzeichnis der Baudenkmäler in Südtirol. Dabei kann es sich beispielsweise um Sakralbauten, Wohnhäuser, Bauernhöfe und Adelsansitze handeln. Die Reihenfolge in dieser Liste orientiert sich an der Bezeichnung, alternativ ist sie auch nach der Adresse oder dem Datum der Unterschutzstellung sortierbar. Liste | Foto   Bezeichnung Standort Eintragung Beschreibung Metadaten ja Altes Gasthaus Janesch ID: 14567 46° 42′ 54″ N, 11° 52′ 42″ O 76882557800 0 8. Sep. 1986 (BLR-LAB 4974) Ländliches Wohnhaus/Bauernhof KG:  Welschellen Bauparzelle: 391 ja Asch (Prack) ID: 14540 46° 43′ 12″ N, 11° 54′ 35″ O 75496485300 20. Nov. 1950 (MD) Ansitz KG:  Enneberg Bauparzelle: 38 ja Biccia mit Stade
            Read more