How can you use ICE tables to solve multiple coupled equilibria?












3












$begingroup$


If I have a problem involving multiple coupled equilibrium reactions, such as




Calcium fluoride, $ce{CaF2}$, has a molar solubility of $pu{2.1e−4 mol L−1}$ at pH = 7.00. By what factor does its molar solubility increase in a solution with pH = 3.00? The p$K_{mathrm{a}}$ of $ce{HF}$ is 3.17.




The relevant reactions are:



$$ce{CaF2(s) <=> Ca^2+(aq) + 2 F-(aq)}$$ and
$$ce{HF(aq) <=> H+(aq) + F-(aq)}$$



They are coupled because fluoride occurs in both of them.



Is there a way to use ICE tables to organize the information (stoichiometry, initial concentrations, mass balance) as a way to solve the problem?



For example, I could try to set up one ICE table for each reaction (the column for $ce{H+}$ is strange because in the problem, the pH is set to a value through an unspecified mechanism):



$$
begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
hline
&[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] \
hline
I & pu{2.1e−4} & pu{4.2e−4} \
hline
C & +x & +2x \
hline
E & pu{2.1e−4}+x & pu{4.2e−4}+2x \
hline
end{array}
$$



and



$$
begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
hline
&[ce{HF}] & [ce{H+}] & [ce{F-}] \
hline
I & 0 & text{N/A} & pu{4.2e−4} \
hline
C & +x &text{N/A} & -x \
hline
E & +x & 10^{-3.00} & pu{4.2e−4} - x\
hline
end{array}
$$



However, how do the fluoride concentrations "talk to each other" in the two tables? Is the $x$ in one table the same as the $x$ in the other table?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    If I have a problem involving multiple coupled equilibrium reactions, such as




    Calcium fluoride, $ce{CaF2}$, has a molar solubility of $pu{2.1e−4 mol L−1}$ at pH = 7.00. By what factor does its molar solubility increase in a solution with pH = 3.00? The p$K_{mathrm{a}}$ of $ce{HF}$ is 3.17.




    The relevant reactions are:



    $$ce{CaF2(s) <=> Ca^2+(aq) + 2 F-(aq)}$$ and
    $$ce{HF(aq) <=> H+(aq) + F-(aq)}$$



    They are coupled because fluoride occurs in both of them.



    Is there a way to use ICE tables to organize the information (stoichiometry, initial concentrations, mass balance) as a way to solve the problem?



    For example, I could try to set up one ICE table for each reaction (the column for $ce{H+}$ is strange because in the problem, the pH is set to a value through an unspecified mechanism):



    $$
    begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
    hline
    &[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] \
    hline
    I & pu{2.1e−4} & pu{4.2e−4} \
    hline
    C & +x & +2x \
    hline
    E & pu{2.1e−4}+x & pu{4.2e−4}+2x \
    hline
    end{array}
    $$



    and



    $$
    begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
    hline
    &[ce{HF}] & [ce{H+}] & [ce{F-}] \
    hline
    I & 0 & text{N/A} & pu{4.2e−4} \
    hline
    C & +x &text{N/A} & -x \
    hline
    E & +x & 10^{-3.00} & pu{4.2e−4} - x\
    hline
    end{array}
    $$



    However, how do the fluoride concentrations "talk to each other" in the two tables? Is the $x$ in one table the same as the $x$ in the other table?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      If I have a problem involving multiple coupled equilibrium reactions, such as




      Calcium fluoride, $ce{CaF2}$, has a molar solubility of $pu{2.1e−4 mol L−1}$ at pH = 7.00. By what factor does its molar solubility increase in a solution with pH = 3.00? The p$K_{mathrm{a}}$ of $ce{HF}$ is 3.17.




      The relevant reactions are:



      $$ce{CaF2(s) <=> Ca^2+(aq) + 2 F-(aq)}$$ and
      $$ce{HF(aq) <=> H+(aq) + F-(aq)}$$



      They are coupled because fluoride occurs in both of them.



      Is there a way to use ICE tables to organize the information (stoichiometry, initial concentrations, mass balance) as a way to solve the problem?



      For example, I could try to set up one ICE table for each reaction (the column for $ce{H+}$ is strange because in the problem, the pH is set to a value through an unspecified mechanism):



      $$
      begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
      hline
      &[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] \
      hline
      I & pu{2.1e−4} & pu{4.2e−4} \
      hline
      C & +x & +2x \
      hline
      E & pu{2.1e−4}+x & pu{4.2e−4}+2x \
      hline
      end{array}
      $$



      and



      $$
      begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
      hline
      &[ce{HF}] & [ce{H+}] & [ce{F-}] \
      hline
      I & 0 & text{N/A} & pu{4.2e−4} \
      hline
      C & +x &text{N/A} & -x \
      hline
      E & +x & 10^{-3.00} & pu{4.2e−4} - x\
      hline
      end{array}
      $$



      However, how do the fluoride concentrations "talk to each other" in the two tables? Is the $x$ in one table the same as the $x$ in the other table?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      If I have a problem involving multiple coupled equilibrium reactions, such as




      Calcium fluoride, $ce{CaF2}$, has a molar solubility of $pu{2.1e−4 mol L−1}$ at pH = 7.00. By what factor does its molar solubility increase in a solution with pH = 3.00? The p$K_{mathrm{a}}$ of $ce{HF}$ is 3.17.




      The relevant reactions are:



      $$ce{CaF2(s) <=> Ca^2+(aq) + 2 F-(aq)}$$ and
      $$ce{HF(aq) <=> H+(aq) + F-(aq)}$$



      They are coupled because fluoride occurs in both of them.



      Is there a way to use ICE tables to organize the information (stoichiometry, initial concentrations, mass balance) as a way to solve the problem?



      For example, I could try to set up one ICE table for each reaction (the column for $ce{H+}$ is strange because in the problem, the pH is set to a value through an unspecified mechanism):



      $$
      begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
      hline
      &[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] \
      hline
      I & pu{2.1e−4} & pu{4.2e−4} \
      hline
      C & +x & +2x \
      hline
      E & pu{2.1e−4}+x & pu{4.2e−4}+2x \
      hline
      end{array}
      $$



      and



      $$
      begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
      hline
      &[ce{HF}] & [ce{H+}] & [ce{F-}] \
      hline
      I & 0 & text{N/A} & pu{4.2e−4} \
      hline
      C & +x &text{N/A} & -x \
      hline
      E & +x & 10^{-3.00} & pu{4.2e−4} - x\
      hline
      end{array}
      $$



      However, how do the fluoride concentrations "talk to each other" in the two tables? Is the $x$ in one table the same as the $x$ in the other table?







      equilibrium






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago









      Mathew Mahindaratne

      3,870318




      3,870318










      asked 5 hours ago









      Karsten TheisKarsten Theis

      2,700434




      2,700434






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          The way to use ICE tables in this case would be to combine the ICE tables, and use "$x$" for the changes due to one reaction and "$y$" for the changes due to the other. For each reaction, you have one unknown (how far it reacted, i.e. $x$ and $y$), so you need two pieces of information to solve it, in this case the two equilibrium constants.



          Here is the combined ICE table:



          $$
          begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
          hline
          &[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] & [ce{H+}]&[ce{HF}] \
          hline
          I & pu{2.1e−4} & pu{4.2e−4} & text{N/A} & 0 \
          hline
          C & +x & +2x-y & text{N/A} & +y \
          hline
          E & pu{2.1e−4}+x & pu{4.2e−4}+2x-y & 10^{-3.00} & +y \
          hline
          end{array}
          $$



          Now, you can use the equilibrium constants for the two reactions to solve for $x$ and $y$, giving you the equilibrium concentrations.



          What the combined table shows is that the fluoride concentration depends on both reactions, so you can't first deal with one equilibrium and then with the other but have to solve a system of two equations with two unknowns.



          Once you combine the tables, you could also have initial conditions where nothing is dissolved yet, to get easier expressions (I'm using $p$ and $q$ because they will be different from $x$ and $y$):



          $$
          begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
          hline
          &[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] & [ce{H+}]&[ce{HF}] \
          hline
          I & 0 & 0 & text{N/A} & 0 \
          hline
          C & +p & +2p-q & text{N/A} & +q \
          hline
          E & +p & +2p-q & 10^{-3.00} & +q \
          hline
          end{array}
          $$






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "431"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f111041%2fhow-can-you-use-ice-tables-to-solve-multiple-coupled-equilibria%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5












            $begingroup$

            The way to use ICE tables in this case would be to combine the ICE tables, and use "$x$" for the changes due to one reaction and "$y$" for the changes due to the other. For each reaction, you have one unknown (how far it reacted, i.e. $x$ and $y$), so you need two pieces of information to solve it, in this case the two equilibrium constants.



            Here is the combined ICE table:



            $$
            begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
            hline
            &[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] & [ce{H+}]&[ce{HF}] \
            hline
            I & pu{2.1e−4} & pu{4.2e−4} & text{N/A} & 0 \
            hline
            C & +x & +2x-y & text{N/A} & +y \
            hline
            E & pu{2.1e−4}+x & pu{4.2e−4}+2x-y & 10^{-3.00} & +y \
            hline
            end{array}
            $$



            Now, you can use the equilibrium constants for the two reactions to solve for $x$ and $y$, giving you the equilibrium concentrations.



            What the combined table shows is that the fluoride concentration depends on both reactions, so you can't first deal with one equilibrium and then with the other but have to solve a system of two equations with two unknowns.



            Once you combine the tables, you could also have initial conditions where nothing is dissolved yet, to get easier expressions (I'm using $p$ and $q$ because they will be different from $x$ and $y$):



            $$
            begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
            hline
            &[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] & [ce{H+}]&[ce{HF}] \
            hline
            I & 0 & 0 & text{N/A} & 0 \
            hline
            C & +p & +2p-q & text{N/A} & +q \
            hline
            E & +p & +2p-q & 10^{-3.00} & +q \
            hline
            end{array}
            $$






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              5












              $begingroup$

              The way to use ICE tables in this case would be to combine the ICE tables, and use "$x$" for the changes due to one reaction and "$y$" for the changes due to the other. For each reaction, you have one unknown (how far it reacted, i.e. $x$ and $y$), so you need two pieces of information to solve it, in this case the two equilibrium constants.



              Here is the combined ICE table:



              $$
              begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
              hline
              &[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] & [ce{H+}]&[ce{HF}] \
              hline
              I & pu{2.1e−4} & pu{4.2e−4} & text{N/A} & 0 \
              hline
              C & +x & +2x-y & text{N/A} & +y \
              hline
              E & pu{2.1e−4}+x & pu{4.2e−4}+2x-y & 10^{-3.00} & +y \
              hline
              end{array}
              $$



              Now, you can use the equilibrium constants for the two reactions to solve for $x$ and $y$, giving you the equilibrium concentrations.



              What the combined table shows is that the fluoride concentration depends on both reactions, so you can't first deal with one equilibrium and then with the other but have to solve a system of two equations with two unknowns.



              Once you combine the tables, you could also have initial conditions where nothing is dissolved yet, to get easier expressions (I'm using $p$ and $q$ because they will be different from $x$ and $y$):



              $$
              begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
              hline
              &[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] & [ce{H+}]&[ce{HF}] \
              hline
              I & 0 & 0 & text{N/A} & 0 \
              hline
              C & +p & +2p-q & text{N/A} & +q \
              hline
              E & +p & +2p-q & 10^{-3.00} & +q \
              hline
              end{array}
              $$






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                5












                5








                5





                $begingroup$

                The way to use ICE tables in this case would be to combine the ICE tables, and use "$x$" for the changes due to one reaction and "$y$" for the changes due to the other. For each reaction, you have one unknown (how far it reacted, i.e. $x$ and $y$), so you need two pieces of information to solve it, in this case the two equilibrium constants.



                Here is the combined ICE table:



                $$
                begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
                hline
                &[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] & [ce{H+}]&[ce{HF}] \
                hline
                I & pu{2.1e−4} & pu{4.2e−4} & text{N/A} & 0 \
                hline
                C & +x & +2x-y & text{N/A} & +y \
                hline
                E & pu{2.1e−4}+x & pu{4.2e−4}+2x-y & 10^{-3.00} & +y \
                hline
                end{array}
                $$



                Now, you can use the equilibrium constants for the two reactions to solve for $x$ and $y$, giving you the equilibrium concentrations.



                What the combined table shows is that the fluoride concentration depends on both reactions, so you can't first deal with one equilibrium and then with the other but have to solve a system of two equations with two unknowns.



                Once you combine the tables, you could also have initial conditions where nothing is dissolved yet, to get easier expressions (I'm using $p$ and $q$ because they will be different from $x$ and $y$):



                $$
                begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
                hline
                &[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] & [ce{H+}]&[ce{HF}] \
                hline
                I & 0 & 0 & text{N/A} & 0 \
                hline
                C & +p & +2p-q & text{N/A} & +q \
                hline
                E & +p & +2p-q & 10^{-3.00} & +q \
                hline
                end{array}
                $$






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                The way to use ICE tables in this case would be to combine the ICE tables, and use "$x$" for the changes due to one reaction and "$y$" for the changes due to the other. For each reaction, you have one unknown (how far it reacted, i.e. $x$ and $y$), so you need two pieces of information to solve it, in this case the two equilibrium constants.



                Here is the combined ICE table:



                $$
                begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
                hline
                &[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] & [ce{H+}]&[ce{HF}] \
                hline
                I & pu{2.1e−4} & pu{4.2e−4} & text{N/A} & 0 \
                hline
                C & +x & +2x-y & text{N/A} & +y \
                hline
                E & pu{2.1e−4}+x & pu{4.2e−4}+2x-y & 10^{-3.00} & +y \
                hline
                end{array}
                $$



                Now, you can use the equilibrium constants for the two reactions to solve for $x$ and $y$, giving you the equilibrium concentrations.



                What the combined table shows is that the fluoride concentration depends on both reactions, so you can't first deal with one equilibrium and then with the other but have to solve a system of two equations with two unknowns.



                Once you combine the tables, you could also have initial conditions where nothing is dissolved yet, to get easier expressions (I'm using $p$ and $q$ because they will be different from $x$ and $y$):



                $$
                begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
                hline
                &[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] & [ce{H+}]&[ce{HF}] \
                hline
                I & 0 & 0 & text{N/A} & 0 \
                hline
                C & +p & +2p-q & text{N/A} & +q \
                hline
                E & +p & +2p-q & 10^{-3.00} & +q \
                hline
                end{array}
                $$







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 2 hours ago









                Mathew Mahindaratne

                3,870318




                3,870318










                answered 5 hours ago









                Karsten TheisKarsten Theis

                2,700434




                2,700434






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f111041%2fhow-can-you-use-ice-tables-to-solve-multiple-coupled-equilibria%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Statuo de Libereco

                    Tanganjiko

                    Liste der Baudenkmäler in Enneberg