Technical interview and code test
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
So I got a task to code some "home work" for a technical interview, where we are going to discuss what and why I did it this way.
I normally dont se any problem doing so. But the case I got recently is just nonsense and this really makes me doubt if I want to work in a place like that and waste time on this task and a new interview.
Its almost like this task is just made in this way, so I should point out how meaningless this is. Is this something that ca company actually would do?
interviewing software-development technology
add a comment |
So I got a task to code some "home work" for a technical interview, where we are going to discuss what and why I did it this way.
I normally dont se any problem doing so. But the case I got recently is just nonsense and this really makes me doubt if I want to work in a place like that and waste time on this task and a new interview.
Its almost like this task is just made in this way, so I should point out how meaningless this is. Is this something that ca company actually would do?
interviewing software-development technology
"Is this something that ca company actually would do?" - I suppose anything is possible, although I don't see the point.
– Joe Strazzere
7 hours ago
add a comment |
So I got a task to code some "home work" for a technical interview, where we are going to discuss what and why I did it this way.
I normally dont se any problem doing so. But the case I got recently is just nonsense and this really makes me doubt if I want to work in a place like that and waste time on this task and a new interview.
Its almost like this task is just made in this way, so I should point out how meaningless this is. Is this something that ca company actually would do?
interviewing software-development technology
So I got a task to code some "home work" for a technical interview, where we are going to discuss what and why I did it this way.
I normally dont se any problem doing so. But the case I got recently is just nonsense and this really makes me doubt if I want to work in a place like that and waste time on this task and a new interview.
Its almost like this task is just made in this way, so I should point out how meaningless this is. Is this something that ca company actually would do?
interviewing software-development technology
interviewing software-development technology
asked 7 hours ago
Mr ZachMr Zach
1154
1154
"Is this something that ca company actually would do?" - I suppose anything is possible, although I don't see the point.
– Joe Strazzere
7 hours ago
add a comment |
"Is this something that ca company actually would do?" - I suppose anything is possible, although I don't see the point.
– Joe Strazzere
7 hours ago
"Is this something that ca company actually would do?" - I suppose anything is possible, although I don't see the point.
– Joe Strazzere
7 hours ago
"Is this something that ca company actually would do?" - I suppose anything is possible, although I don't see the point.
– Joe Strazzere
7 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
I can't imagine a scenario where an interviewer would assign a task as a test of whether or not a candidate is able to recognize the task has no value. If you're convinced the task in no way measures your skills as a developer, you could send a follow up email and ask what they're trying to gauge. If it's not a job you're particularly keen on landing, I would probably just call it a day and move on to the next one.
add a comment |
I would recommend you seek an opinion about if it is nonsense from your peers in the industry.
Also, sometimes these screening exercises can be from a recruitment agency, and not from the organisation itself. And sometimes these recruitment agencies can be quite... wacky... with the stuff they come up with.
If you want the job, I'd complete it. If you get hired, and the actual work is the same, you can always leave. You are not locked in for life.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f133366%2ftechnical-interview-and-code-test%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I can't imagine a scenario where an interviewer would assign a task as a test of whether or not a candidate is able to recognize the task has no value. If you're convinced the task in no way measures your skills as a developer, you could send a follow up email and ask what they're trying to gauge. If it's not a job you're particularly keen on landing, I would probably just call it a day and move on to the next one.
add a comment |
I can't imagine a scenario where an interviewer would assign a task as a test of whether or not a candidate is able to recognize the task has no value. If you're convinced the task in no way measures your skills as a developer, you could send a follow up email and ask what they're trying to gauge. If it's not a job you're particularly keen on landing, I would probably just call it a day and move on to the next one.
add a comment |
I can't imagine a scenario where an interviewer would assign a task as a test of whether or not a candidate is able to recognize the task has no value. If you're convinced the task in no way measures your skills as a developer, you could send a follow up email and ask what they're trying to gauge. If it's not a job you're particularly keen on landing, I would probably just call it a day and move on to the next one.
I can't imagine a scenario where an interviewer would assign a task as a test of whether or not a candidate is able to recognize the task has no value. If you're convinced the task in no way measures your skills as a developer, you could send a follow up email and ask what they're trying to gauge. If it's not a job you're particularly keen on landing, I would probably just call it a day and move on to the next one.
edited 7 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
AffableAmblerAffableAmbler
4,92521029
4,92521029
add a comment |
add a comment |
I would recommend you seek an opinion about if it is nonsense from your peers in the industry.
Also, sometimes these screening exercises can be from a recruitment agency, and not from the organisation itself. And sometimes these recruitment agencies can be quite... wacky... with the stuff they come up with.
If you want the job, I'd complete it. If you get hired, and the actual work is the same, you can always leave. You are not locked in for life.
add a comment |
I would recommend you seek an opinion about if it is nonsense from your peers in the industry.
Also, sometimes these screening exercises can be from a recruitment agency, and not from the organisation itself. And sometimes these recruitment agencies can be quite... wacky... with the stuff they come up with.
If you want the job, I'd complete it. If you get hired, and the actual work is the same, you can always leave. You are not locked in for life.
add a comment |
I would recommend you seek an opinion about if it is nonsense from your peers in the industry.
Also, sometimes these screening exercises can be from a recruitment agency, and not from the organisation itself. And sometimes these recruitment agencies can be quite... wacky... with the stuff they come up with.
If you want the job, I'd complete it. If you get hired, and the actual work is the same, you can always leave. You are not locked in for life.
I would recommend you seek an opinion about if it is nonsense from your peers in the industry.
Also, sometimes these screening exercises can be from a recruitment agency, and not from the organisation itself. And sometimes these recruitment agencies can be quite... wacky... with the stuff they come up with.
If you want the job, I'd complete it. If you get hired, and the actual work is the same, you can always leave. You are not locked in for life.
answered 5 hours ago
Gregory CurrieGregory Currie
5,43382442
5,43382442
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f133366%2ftechnical-interview-and-code-test%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
"Is this something that ca company actually would do?" - I suppose anything is possible, although I don't see the point.
– Joe Strazzere
7 hours ago