Equivalence principle before Einstein [duplicate]












5












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Did Galileo state the principle of equivalence in full generality?

    1 answer




In a German interview some physicists were asked, what they would ask Einstein, if he were alive today. One of them wanted to know how Einstein came up with the idea of the equivalence principle, that inertial mass is the same as gravitational mass. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I always believed that was known way before Einstein. And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a leaning tower and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same.



My question is, does somebody know the name of this famous person, who conducted the experiment? I can't remember it.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Conifold, Community yesterday


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.





migrated from physics.stackexchange.com yesterday


This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.














  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Galileo Galilei, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
    $endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    2 days ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same." I think you mean Galileo Galilei.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the history of physics, not physics primarily.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    It's also notable that he never did this experiment. He experimented with sloped planes, but the two body drop was his thought experiment: what if we connect the bodies with a piece of chain and then reduce and reduce its length until there is no chain?
    $endgroup$
    – kkm
    16 hours ago
















5












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Did Galileo state the principle of equivalence in full generality?

    1 answer




In a German interview some physicists were asked, what they would ask Einstein, if he were alive today. One of them wanted to know how Einstein came up with the idea of the equivalence principle, that inertial mass is the same as gravitational mass. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I always believed that was known way before Einstein. And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a leaning tower and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same.



My question is, does somebody know the name of this famous person, who conducted the experiment? I can't remember it.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Conifold, Community yesterday


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.





migrated from physics.stackexchange.com yesterday


This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.














  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Galileo Galilei, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
    $endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    2 days ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same." I think you mean Galileo Galilei.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the history of physics, not physics primarily.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    It's also notable that he never did this experiment. He experimented with sloped planes, but the two body drop was his thought experiment: what if we connect the bodies with a piece of chain and then reduce and reduce its length until there is no chain?
    $endgroup$
    – kkm
    16 hours ago














5












5








5





$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Did Galileo state the principle of equivalence in full generality?

    1 answer




In a German interview some physicists were asked, what they would ask Einstein, if he were alive today. One of them wanted to know how Einstein came up with the idea of the equivalence principle, that inertial mass is the same as gravitational mass. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I always believed that was known way before Einstein. And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a leaning tower and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same.



My question is, does somebody know the name of this famous person, who conducted the experiment? I can't remember it.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:




  • Did Galileo state the principle of equivalence in full generality?

    1 answer




In a German interview some physicists were asked, what they would ask Einstein, if he were alive today. One of them wanted to know how Einstein came up with the idea of the equivalence principle, that inertial mass is the same as gravitational mass. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I always believed that was known way before Einstein. And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a leaning tower and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same.



My question is, does somebody know the name of this famous person, who conducted the experiment? I can't remember it.





This question already has an answer here:




  • Did Galileo state the principle of equivalence in full generality?

    1 answer








physics






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Nick R

3,359723




3,359723










asked 2 days ago









MaximMaxim

1263




1263




marked as duplicate by Conifold, Community yesterday


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.





migrated from physics.stackexchange.com yesterday


This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.









marked as duplicate by Conifold, Community yesterday


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.





migrated from physics.stackexchange.com yesterday


This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.










  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Galileo Galilei, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
    $endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    2 days ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same." I think you mean Galileo Galilei.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the history of physics, not physics primarily.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    It's also notable that he never did this experiment. He experimented with sloped planes, but the two body drop was his thought experiment: what if we connect the bodies with a piece of chain and then reduce and reduce its length until there is no chain?
    $endgroup$
    – kkm
    16 hours ago














  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Galileo Galilei, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
    $endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    2 days ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same." I think you mean Galileo Galilei.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the history of physics, not physics primarily.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    It's also notable that he never did this experiment. He experimented with sloped planes, but the two body drop was his thought experiment: what if we connect the bodies with a piece of chain and then reduce and reduce its length until there is no chain?
    $endgroup$
    – kkm
    16 hours ago








4




4




$begingroup$
Galileo Galilei, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
$endgroup$
– hyportnex
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Galileo Galilei, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
$endgroup$
– hyportnex
2 days ago




3




3




$begingroup$
"And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same." I think you mean Galileo Galilei.
$endgroup$
– Gert
2 days ago




$begingroup$
"And I have an experiment in mind where one famous guy standing on a church and letting two things fall with different mass to test if gravity acts on every object the same." I think you mean Galileo Galilei.
$endgroup$
– Gert
2 days ago




2




2




$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the history of physics, not physics primarily.
$endgroup$
– Gert
2 days ago




$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the history of physics, not physics primarily.
$endgroup$
– Gert
2 days ago












$begingroup$
It's also notable that he never did this experiment. He experimented with sloped planes, but the two body drop was his thought experiment: what if we connect the bodies with a piece of chain and then reduce and reduce its length until there is no chain?
$endgroup$
– kkm
16 hours ago




$begingroup$
It's also notable that he never did this experiment. He experimented with sloped planes, but the two body drop was his thought experiment: what if we connect the bodies with a piece of chain and then reduce and reduce its length until there is no chain?
$endgroup$
– kkm
16 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















11












$begingroup$

There are lots of different ways of stating the equivalence principle, and they're not all logically ... er ... equivalent to each other.



Names that come up in this connection, from before Einstein, are Galileo and Eotvos. Experiments that test the equality of gravitational and inertial mass are called Eotvos experiments.



Einstein's version of the equivalence principle is more radical than anything that Galileo or Newton envisioned. It entails throwing away the whole concept of a universal reference frame and instead defining inertial frames as local, free-falling frames. Previously, people had imagined that there was a frame of the "fixed stars," which was as good an approximation to an inertial frame as we would ever need. But according to relativity, observers in New York and Beijing can't even have the same frame of reference.



Taking the equivalence principle seriously also leads to the prediction of gravitational time dilation, which is something that nobody before Einstein had imagined.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    11












    $begingroup$

    There are lots of different ways of stating the equivalence principle, and they're not all logically ... er ... equivalent to each other.



    Names that come up in this connection, from before Einstein, are Galileo and Eotvos. Experiments that test the equality of gravitational and inertial mass are called Eotvos experiments.



    Einstein's version of the equivalence principle is more radical than anything that Galileo or Newton envisioned. It entails throwing away the whole concept of a universal reference frame and instead defining inertial frames as local, free-falling frames. Previously, people had imagined that there was a frame of the "fixed stars," which was as good an approximation to an inertial frame as we would ever need. But according to relativity, observers in New York and Beijing can't even have the same frame of reference.



    Taking the equivalence principle seriously also leads to the prediction of gravitational time dilation, which is something that nobody before Einstein had imagined.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      11












      $begingroup$

      There are lots of different ways of stating the equivalence principle, and they're not all logically ... er ... equivalent to each other.



      Names that come up in this connection, from before Einstein, are Galileo and Eotvos. Experiments that test the equality of gravitational and inertial mass are called Eotvos experiments.



      Einstein's version of the equivalence principle is more radical than anything that Galileo or Newton envisioned. It entails throwing away the whole concept of a universal reference frame and instead defining inertial frames as local, free-falling frames. Previously, people had imagined that there was a frame of the "fixed stars," which was as good an approximation to an inertial frame as we would ever need. But according to relativity, observers in New York and Beijing can't even have the same frame of reference.



      Taking the equivalence principle seriously also leads to the prediction of gravitational time dilation, which is something that nobody before Einstein had imagined.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        11












        11








        11





        $begingroup$

        There are lots of different ways of stating the equivalence principle, and they're not all logically ... er ... equivalent to each other.



        Names that come up in this connection, from before Einstein, are Galileo and Eotvos. Experiments that test the equality of gravitational and inertial mass are called Eotvos experiments.



        Einstein's version of the equivalence principle is more radical than anything that Galileo or Newton envisioned. It entails throwing away the whole concept of a universal reference frame and instead defining inertial frames as local, free-falling frames. Previously, people had imagined that there was a frame of the "fixed stars," which was as good an approximation to an inertial frame as we would ever need. But according to relativity, observers in New York and Beijing can't even have the same frame of reference.



        Taking the equivalence principle seriously also leads to the prediction of gravitational time dilation, which is something that nobody before Einstein had imagined.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        There are lots of different ways of stating the equivalence principle, and they're not all logically ... er ... equivalent to each other.



        Names that come up in this connection, from before Einstein, are Galileo and Eotvos. Experiments that test the equality of gravitational and inertial mass are called Eotvos experiments.



        Einstein's version of the equivalence principle is more radical than anything that Galileo or Newton envisioned. It entails throwing away the whole concept of a universal reference frame and instead defining inertial frames as local, free-falling frames. Previously, people had imagined that there was a frame of the "fixed stars," which was as good an approximation to an inertial frame as we would ever need. But according to relativity, observers in New York and Beijing can't even have the same frame of reference.



        Taking the equivalence principle seriously also leads to the prediction of gravitational time dilation, which is something that nobody before Einstein had imagined.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        Ben CrowellBen Crowell

        1,711825




        1,711825















            Popular posts from this blog

            Statuo de Libereco

            Tanganjiko

            Liste der Baudenkmäler in Enneberg