Why do we divide Permutations to get to Combinations?












3












$begingroup$


I'm having a hard time reasoning through the formula for combinations $frac{n!}{k!left(n-kright)!}$. I understand the reason for the permutations formula and I know that for the combinations we divide by $k!$ to adjust for the repeated cases, since order does not matter. But what exactly happens when we divide the set of permutations by $k!$ ?



I know this may seem like a silly question... I just can't take this for granted, lest I miss a chance to apply it correctly. Can you describe what's happening here step by step, sort like debugging a script?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    I'm having a hard time reasoning through the formula for combinations $frac{n!}{k!left(n-kright)!}$. I understand the reason for the permutations formula and I know that for the combinations we divide by $k!$ to adjust for the repeated cases, since order does not matter. But what exactly happens when we divide the set of permutations by $k!$ ?



    I know this may seem like a silly question... I just can't take this for granted, lest I miss a chance to apply it correctly. Can you describe what's happening here step by step, sort like debugging a script?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      I'm having a hard time reasoning through the formula for combinations $frac{n!}{k!left(n-kright)!}$. I understand the reason for the permutations formula and I know that for the combinations we divide by $k!$ to adjust for the repeated cases, since order does not matter. But what exactly happens when we divide the set of permutations by $k!$ ?



      I know this may seem like a silly question... I just can't take this for granted, lest I miss a chance to apply it correctly. Can you describe what's happening here step by step, sort like debugging a script?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I'm having a hard time reasoning through the formula for combinations $frac{n!}{k!left(n-kright)!}$. I understand the reason for the permutations formula and I know that for the combinations we divide by $k!$ to adjust for the repeated cases, since order does not matter. But what exactly happens when we divide the set of permutations by $k!$ ?



      I know this may seem like a silly question... I just can't take this for granted, lest I miss a chance to apply it correctly. Can you describe what's happening here step by step, sort like debugging a script?







      combinatorics permutations






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 6 hours ago









      Bernard

      121k740116




      121k740116










      asked 6 hours ago









      Daniel OscarDaniel Oscar

      1438




      1438






















          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Maybe, looking at an example clarifies this best :



          You have $20$ objects and have to choose $5$ of them. How many possibilities are there ?



          You have $20,19,18,17,16$ choices explaining how $frac{20!}{15!}$ comes into the play.



          Now each combination can appear in $5!$ possible orders which correspond to the same combination. Therefore we have to divide by $5!$ to find the number of combinations.



          This can be generalized to arbitary numbers explaining how the binomial coefficient emerges.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            3












            $begingroup$

            Let's bunch together permutations that have the same content. Each resulting equivalence class has $k!$ members. Therefore, the number of such classes is $k!$ times smaller than the number of permutations. A combination is just an equivalence class or, if you prefer, one nominated element thereof.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$





















              2












              $begingroup$

              Assume that you want to know the number of combinations of $k$ elements out of $n$ elements. One way to pick such a combination is the arrange all $n$ elements in any arbitrary order (there are $n!$ ways to do so) and pick the first $k$ of them as "your selection". As the remaining $n-k$ elements can be arranged in any order, each ordered selection of the first $k$ elements appears $(n-k)!$ times in the set of all permutations of the $n$ elements, so you have to divide $n!$ by $(n-k)!$ to count the different (ordered) "selections" of $k$ elements. Now, as you are not interested in the order of the $k$ elements, all $k!$ permutations of a "selection" represent the same combination, so you still have to divide the number by $k!$, which makes a total of $frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$ combinations. So, in short, this dividing "removes the order" when counting (here: the order of the first $k$ elements and the order of the remaining $n-k$ elements).






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$





















                2












                $begingroup$

                This is the formula for selecting from a distinct list of items. Lets say we pick from 100 songs on a top song list. We only care to pick the top 5 songs. Okay, there are 100! ways to arrange the songs on the original list. Once we take off the top 5, two things happen. The order of the remaining 95 don't matter they aren't the top 5, dividing by 95! cuts that away. We don't care what order the Top 5 are played in, so we divide out the possible orders those top 5 could have, 5! in total number. This arrives us at: $$frac{100!}{(95!)(5!)}$$



                EDIT: To show why distinctness matters, Here's a case, where it won't give you the number of distinguishable states chessboard positions (legal or not, with all 32 pieces). Why because you have 2 each of indistinguishable rooks,knights,and bishops on each side, as well as 8 indistinguishable pawns on each. This means there are 2×2×2×2×2×2×40,560×40,560= 105,287,270,400 times as many positions if you distinguish between indistinguisable pieces swapping places. brings it less than $1.22times 10^{78}$ instead of more than 1.26 times 10 to the 89 .






                share|cite|improve this answer










                New contributor




                Roddy MacPhee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$





















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  Imagine you have $5$ sports cars that are to be displayed in an event, but there are only 3 spots avaiable. Lamborghini, Mercedez, Ferrari, Porsche, and Bugatti.



                  Let's say you choose a Mercedez, a Ferrari, and a Lamborghini. There are $5 times 4 times 3 = 5!/2!$ ways to arrange these cars



                  Notice, however, that the display (Lamborghini, Mercedez, Ferrari) is the same display as (Mercedez, Ferrari, Lamborghini) because you have the same selection of cars. You can arrange $3$ objects in $3!$ ways and still have the same collection of objects.



                  Therefore you must divide the $5 times 4 times 3 = 5!/2!$ by $3!$, leading to $$ frac{5!}{3!2!}$$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$





















                    0












                    $begingroup$

                    My favorite way of explaining this to myself actually would be something in this vein.



                    Suppose we have a set of $n$ objects, and we want to find the number of unique $k$-arrangements of them - that is, take $k$ objects from the $n$, and each unique arrangement counts as a single one. The term "arrangement" is important - that means order matters. We know this to be given by



                    $$P(n,k) = frac{n!}{(n-k)!}$$



                    You can rationalize this by thinking of your $k$-arrangement having "slots", and filling them in order. The first slot can be filled by $n$ potential items, the second by $n-1$, and in general the $i^{th}$ by $n-(i+1)$. This gives



                    $$P(n,k) = n(n-1)(n-2)...(n-i+1)$$



                    It is a trivial exercise in algebra to show both expressions are equal.





                    This becomes relevant when we consider the selection argument. In this case we want the number of $k$-selections - the number of ways to take $k$ objects from the $n$, but this time order doesn't matter.



                    This is my favorite way to think of it because I didn't realize this until a few weeks ago - I had just been blindly using the known formulas until an "aha!" moment.



                    Consider a particular $k$-arrangement from our permutation argument. Let it be the permutation



                    $$(x_1,x_2,x_3,...,x_k)$$



                    where each $x_i$ is one of the $n$ objects. We know that, no matter which way we arrange this, however, it will be considered the same selection, because in selections/combinations, order does not matter. I could swap $x_1$ and $x_2$, or I could reverse the order, or I could order them "even-odd-even-odd" -- it doesn't matter, they're all the same one.



                    Which then brings up the question - how many ways are there to rearrange $k$ objects? We know this to be $P(k,k) = k!$. This means that, for every particular arrangement, it is in a sort of "class" of arrangements that are indistinct as selections. For every arrangement of $k$ objects, only one of those $k!$ arrangements is distinct - and that is for every arrangement.



                    That allows us to conclude that the number of selections/combinations is given by



                    $$C(n,k) = frac{P(n,k)}{k!}$$



                    Explicitly using the formula for $P(n,k)$, then,



                    $$C(n,k) = frac{P(n,k)}{k!} = frac{1}{k!} P(n,k) = frac{1}{k!} cdot frac{n!}{(n-k)!} = frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$$






                    share|cite









                    $endgroup$













                      Your Answer





                      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                      });
                      });
                      }, "mathjax-editing");

                      StackExchange.ready(function() {
                      var channelOptions = {
                      tags: "".split(" "),
                      id: "69"
                      };
                      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                      createEditor();
                      });
                      }
                      else {
                      createEditor();
                      }
                      });

                      function createEditor() {
                      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                      heartbeatType: 'answer',
                      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                      convertImagesToLinks: true,
                      noModals: true,
                      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                      reputationToPostImages: 10,
                      bindNavPrevention: true,
                      postfix: "",
                      imageUploader: {
                      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                      allowUrls: true
                      },
                      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                      });


                      }
                      });














                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3120653%2fwhy-do-we-divide-permutations-to-get-to-combinations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown

























                      6 Answers
                      6






                      active

                      oldest

                      votes








                      6 Answers
                      6






                      active

                      oldest

                      votes









                      active

                      oldest

                      votes






                      active

                      oldest

                      votes









                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      Maybe, looking at an example clarifies this best :



                      You have $20$ objects and have to choose $5$ of them. How many possibilities are there ?



                      You have $20,19,18,17,16$ choices explaining how $frac{20!}{15!}$ comes into the play.



                      Now each combination can appear in $5!$ possible orders which correspond to the same combination. Therefore we have to divide by $5!$ to find the number of combinations.



                      This can be generalized to arbitary numbers explaining how the binomial coefficient emerges.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        3












                        $begingroup$

                        Maybe, looking at an example clarifies this best :



                        You have $20$ objects and have to choose $5$ of them. How many possibilities are there ?



                        You have $20,19,18,17,16$ choices explaining how $frac{20!}{15!}$ comes into the play.



                        Now each combination can appear in $5!$ possible orders which correspond to the same combination. Therefore we have to divide by $5!$ to find the number of combinations.



                        This can be generalized to arbitary numbers explaining how the binomial coefficient emerges.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          3












                          3








                          3





                          $begingroup$

                          Maybe, looking at an example clarifies this best :



                          You have $20$ objects and have to choose $5$ of them. How many possibilities are there ?



                          You have $20,19,18,17,16$ choices explaining how $frac{20!}{15!}$ comes into the play.



                          Now each combination can appear in $5!$ possible orders which correspond to the same combination. Therefore we have to divide by $5!$ to find the number of combinations.



                          This can be generalized to arbitary numbers explaining how the binomial coefficient emerges.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Maybe, looking at an example clarifies this best :



                          You have $20$ objects and have to choose $5$ of them. How many possibilities are there ?



                          You have $20,19,18,17,16$ choices explaining how $frac{20!}{15!}$ comes into the play.



                          Now each combination can appear in $5!$ possible orders which correspond to the same combination. Therefore we have to divide by $5!$ to find the number of combinations.



                          This can be generalized to arbitary numbers explaining how the binomial coefficient emerges.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 6 hours ago









                          PeterPeter

                          47.7k1139131




                          47.7k1139131























                              3












                              $begingroup$

                              Let's bunch together permutations that have the same content. Each resulting equivalence class has $k!$ members. Therefore, the number of such classes is $k!$ times smaller than the number of permutations. A combination is just an equivalence class or, if you prefer, one nominated element thereof.






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$


















                                3












                                $begingroup$

                                Let's bunch together permutations that have the same content. Each resulting equivalence class has $k!$ members. Therefore, the number of such classes is $k!$ times smaller than the number of permutations. A combination is just an equivalence class or, if you prefer, one nominated element thereof.






                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$
















                                  3












                                  3








                                  3





                                  $begingroup$

                                  Let's bunch together permutations that have the same content. Each resulting equivalence class has $k!$ members. Therefore, the number of such classes is $k!$ times smaller than the number of permutations. A combination is just an equivalence class or, if you prefer, one nominated element thereof.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$



                                  Let's bunch together permutations that have the same content. Each resulting equivalence class has $k!$ members. Therefore, the number of such classes is $k!$ times smaller than the number of permutations. A combination is just an equivalence class or, if you prefer, one nominated element thereof.







                                  share|cite|improve this answer












                                  share|cite|improve this answer



                                  share|cite|improve this answer










                                  answered 6 hours ago









                                  J.G.J.G.

                                  27.5k22843




                                  27.5k22843























                                      2












                                      $begingroup$

                                      Assume that you want to know the number of combinations of $k$ elements out of $n$ elements. One way to pick such a combination is the arrange all $n$ elements in any arbitrary order (there are $n!$ ways to do so) and pick the first $k$ of them as "your selection". As the remaining $n-k$ elements can be arranged in any order, each ordered selection of the first $k$ elements appears $(n-k)!$ times in the set of all permutations of the $n$ elements, so you have to divide $n!$ by $(n-k)!$ to count the different (ordered) "selections" of $k$ elements. Now, as you are not interested in the order of the $k$ elements, all $k!$ permutations of a "selection" represent the same combination, so you still have to divide the number by $k!$, which makes a total of $frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$ combinations. So, in short, this dividing "removes the order" when counting (here: the order of the first $k$ elements and the order of the remaining $n-k$ elements).






                                      share|cite|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$


















                                        2












                                        $begingroup$

                                        Assume that you want to know the number of combinations of $k$ elements out of $n$ elements. One way to pick such a combination is the arrange all $n$ elements in any arbitrary order (there are $n!$ ways to do so) and pick the first $k$ of them as "your selection". As the remaining $n-k$ elements can be arranged in any order, each ordered selection of the first $k$ elements appears $(n-k)!$ times in the set of all permutations of the $n$ elements, so you have to divide $n!$ by $(n-k)!$ to count the different (ordered) "selections" of $k$ elements. Now, as you are not interested in the order of the $k$ elements, all $k!$ permutations of a "selection" represent the same combination, so you still have to divide the number by $k!$, which makes a total of $frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$ combinations. So, in short, this dividing "removes the order" when counting (here: the order of the first $k$ elements and the order of the remaining $n-k$ elements).






                                        share|cite|improve this answer









                                        $endgroup$
















                                          2












                                          2








                                          2





                                          $begingroup$

                                          Assume that you want to know the number of combinations of $k$ elements out of $n$ elements. One way to pick such a combination is the arrange all $n$ elements in any arbitrary order (there are $n!$ ways to do so) and pick the first $k$ of them as "your selection". As the remaining $n-k$ elements can be arranged in any order, each ordered selection of the first $k$ elements appears $(n-k)!$ times in the set of all permutations of the $n$ elements, so you have to divide $n!$ by $(n-k)!$ to count the different (ordered) "selections" of $k$ elements. Now, as you are not interested in the order of the $k$ elements, all $k!$ permutations of a "selection" represent the same combination, so you still have to divide the number by $k!$, which makes a total of $frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$ combinations. So, in short, this dividing "removes the order" when counting (here: the order of the first $k$ elements and the order of the remaining $n-k$ elements).






                                          share|cite|improve this answer









                                          $endgroup$



                                          Assume that you want to know the number of combinations of $k$ elements out of $n$ elements. One way to pick such a combination is the arrange all $n$ elements in any arbitrary order (there are $n!$ ways to do so) and pick the first $k$ of them as "your selection". As the remaining $n-k$ elements can be arranged in any order, each ordered selection of the first $k$ elements appears $(n-k)!$ times in the set of all permutations of the $n$ elements, so you have to divide $n!$ by $(n-k)!$ to count the different (ordered) "selections" of $k$ elements. Now, as you are not interested in the order of the $k$ elements, all $k!$ permutations of a "selection" represent the same combination, so you still have to divide the number by $k!$, which makes a total of $frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$ combinations. So, in short, this dividing "removes the order" when counting (here: the order of the first $k$ elements and the order of the remaining $n-k$ elements).







                                          share|cite|improve this answer












                                          share|cite|improve this answer



                                          share|cite|improve this answer










                                          answered 4 hours ago









                                          Wolfgang KaisWolfgang Kais

                                          5765




                                          5765























                                              2












                                              $begingroup$

                                              This is the formula for selecting from a distinct list of items. Lets say we pick from 100 songs on a top song list. We only care to pick the top 5 songs. Okay, there are 100! ways to arrange the songs on the original list. Once we take off the top 5, two things happen. The order of the remaining 95 don't matter they aren't the top 5, dividing by 95! cuts that away. We don't care what order the Top 5 are played in, so we divide out the possible orders those top 5 could have, 5! in total number. This arrives us at: $$frac{100!}{(95!)(5!)}$$



                                              EDIT: To show why distinctness matters, Here's a case, where it won't give you the number of distinguishable states chessboard positions (legal or not, with all 32 pieces). Why because you have 2 each of indistinguishable rooks,knights,and bishops on each side, as well as 8 indistinguishable pawns on each. This means there are 2×2×2×2×2×2×40,560×40,560= 105,287,270,400 times as many positions if you distinguish between indistinguisable pieces swapping places. brings it less than $1.22times 10^{78}$ instead of more than 1.26 times 10 to the 89 .






                                              share|cite|improve this answer










                                              New contributor




                                              Roddy MacPhee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                              $endgroup$


















                                                2












                                                $begingroup$

                                                This is the formula for selecting from a distinct list of items. Lets say we pick from 100 songs on a top song list. We only care to pick the top 5 songs. Okay, there are 100! ways to arrange the songs on the original list. Once we take off the top 5, two things happen. The order of the remaining 95 don't matter they aren't the top 5, dividing by 95! cuts that away. We don't care what order the Top 5 are played in, so we divide out the possible orders those top 5 could have, 5! in total number. This arrives us at: $$frac{100!}{(95!)(5!)}$$



                                                EDIT: To show why distinctness matters, Here's a case, where it won't give you the number of distinguishable states chessboard positions (legal or not, with all 32 pieces). Why because you have 2 each of indistinguishable rooks,knights,and bishops on each side, as well as 8 indistinguishable pawns on each. This means there are 2×2×2×2×2×2×40,560×40,560= 105,287,270,400 times as many positions if you distinguish between indistinguisable pieces swapping places. brings it less than $1.22times 10^{78}$ instead of more than 1.26 times 10 to the 89 .






                                                share|cite|improve this answer










                                                New contributor




                                                Roddy MacPhee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                                $endgroup$
















                                                  2












                                                  2








                                                  2





                                                  $begingroup$

                                                  This is the formula for selecting from a distinct list of items. Lets say we pick from 100 songs on a top song list. We only care to pick the top 5 songs. Okay, there are 100! ways to arrange the songs on the original list. Once we take off the top 5, two things happen. The order of the remaining 95 don't matter they aren't the top 5, dividing by 95! cuts that away. We don't care what order the Top 5 are played in, so we divide out the possible orders those top 5 could have, 5! in total number. This arrives us at: $$frac{100!}{(95!)(5!)}$$



                                                  EDIT: To show why distinctness matters, Here's a case, where it won't give you the number of distinguishable states chessboard positions (legal or not, with all 32 pieces). Why because you have 2 each of indistinguishable rooks,knights,and bishops on each side, as well as 8 indistinguishable pawns on each. This means there are 2×2×2×2×2×2×40,560×40,560= 105,287,270,400 times as many positions if you distinguish between indistinguisable pieces swapping places. brings it less than $1.22times 10^{78}$ instead of more than 1.26 times 10 to the 89 .






                                                  share|cite|improve this answer










                                                  New contributor




                                                  Roddy MacPhee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                                  $endgroup$



                                                  This is the formula for selecting from a distinct list of items. Lets say we pick from 100 songs on a top song list. We only care to pick the top 5 songs. Okay, there are 100! ways to arrange the songs on the original list. Once we take off the top 5, two things happen. The order of the remaining 95 don't matter they aren't the top 5, dividing by 95! cuts that away. We don't care what order the Top 5 are played in, so we divide out the possible orders those top 5 could have, 5! in total number. This arrives us at: $$frac{100!}{(95!)(5!)}$$



                                                  EDIT: To show why distinctness matters, Here's a case, where it won't give you the number of distinguishable states chessboard positions (legal or not, with all 32 pieces). Why because you have 2 each of indistinguishable rooks,knights,and bishops on each side, as well as 8 indistinguishable pawns on each. This means there are 2×2×2×2×2×2×40,560×40,560= 105,287,270,400 times as many positions if you distinguish between indistinguisable pieces swapping places. brings it less than $1.22times 10^{78}$ instead of more than 1.26 times 10 to the 89 .







                                                  share|cite|improve this answer










                                                  New contributor




                                                  Roddy MacPhee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                                  share|cite|improve this answer



                                                  share|cite|improve this answer








                                                  edited 37 mins ago





















                                                  New contributor




                                                  Roddy MacPhee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                                  answered 4 hours ago









                                                  Roddy MacPheeRoddy MacPhee

                                                  7010




                                                  7010




                                                  New contributor




                                                  Roddy MacPhee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                                  New contributor





                                                  Roddy MacPhee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                                  Roddy MacPhee is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.























                                                      1












                                                      $begingroup$

                                                      Imagine you have $5$ sports cars that are to be displayed in an event, but there are only 3 spots avaiable. Lamborghini, Mercedez, Ferrari, Porsche, and Bugatti.



                                                      Let's say you choose a Mercedez, a Ferrari, and a Lamborghini. There are $5 times 4 times 3 = 5!/2!$ ways to arrange these cars



                                                      Notice, however, that the display (Lamborghini, Mercedez, Ferrari) is the same display as (Mercedez, Ferrari, Lamborghini) because you have the same selection of cars. You can arrange $3$ objects in $3!$ ways and still have the same collection of objects.



                                                      Therefore you must divide the $5 times 4 times 3 = 5!/2!$ by $3!$, leading to $$ frac{5!}{3!2!}$$.






                                                      share|cite|improve this answer









                                                      $endgroup$


















                                                        1












                                                        $begingroup$

                                                        Imagine you have $5$ sports cars that are to be displayed in an event, but there are only 3 spots avaiable. Lamborghini, Mercedez, Ferrari, Porsche, and Bugatti.



                                                        Let's say you choose a Mercedez, a Ferrari, and a Lamborghini. There are $5 times 4 times 3 = 5!/2!$ ways to arrange these cars



                                                        Notice, however, that the display (Lamborghini, Mercedez, Ferrari) is the same display as (Mercedez, Ferrari, Lamborghini) because you have the same selection of cars. You can arrange $3$ objects in $3!$ ways and still have the same collection of objects.



                                                        Therefore you must divide the $5 times 4 times 3 = 5!/2!$ by $3!$, leading to $$ frac{5!}{3!2!}$$.






                                                        share|cite|improve this answer









                                                        $endgroup$
















                                                          1












                                                          1








                                                          1





                                                          $begingroup$

                                                          Imagine you have $5$ sports cars that are to be displayed in an event, but there are only 3 spots avaiable. Lamborghini, Mercedez, Ferrari, Porsche, and Bugatti.



                                                          Let's say you choose a Mercedez, a Ferrari, and a Lamborghini. There are $5 times 4 times 3 = 5!/2!$ ways to arrange these cars



                                                          Notice, however, that the display (Lamborghini, Mercedez, Ferrari) is the same display as (Mercedez, Ferrari, Lamborghini) because you have the same selection of cars. You can arrange $3$ objects in $3!$ ways and still have the same collection of objects.



                                                          Therefore you must divide the $5 times 4 times 3 = 5!/2!$ by $3!$, leading to $$ frac{5!}{3!2!}$$.






                                                          share|cite|improve this answer









                                                          $endgroup$



                                                          Imagine you have $5$ sports cars that are to be displayed in an event, but there are only 3 spots avaiable. Lamborghini, Mercedez, Ferrari, Porsche, and Bugatti.



                                                          Let's say you choose a Mercedez, a Ferrari, and a Lamborghini. There are $5 times 4 times 3 = 5!/2!$ ways to arrange these cars



                                                          Notice, however, that the display (Lamborghini, Mercedez, Ferrari) is the same display as (Mercedez, Ferrari, Lamborghini) because you have the same selection of cars. You can arrange $3$ objects in $3!$ ways and still have the same collection of objects.



                                                          Therefore you must divide the $5 times 4 times 3 = 5!/2!$ by $3!$, leading to $$ frac{5!}{3!2!}$$.







                                                          share|cite|improve this answer












                                                          share|cite|improve this answer



                                                          share|cite|improve this answer










                                                          answered 5 hours ago









                                                          Victor S.Victor S.

                                                          1999




                                                          1999























                                                              0












                                                              $begingroup$

                                                              My favorite way of explaining this to myself actually would be something in this vein.



                                                              Suppose we have a set of $n$ objects, and we want to find the number of unique $k$-arrangements of them - that is, take $k$ objects from the $n$, and each unique arrangement counts as a single one. The term "arrangement" is important - that means order matters. We know this to be given by



                                                              $$P(n,k) = frac{n!}{(n-k)!}$$



                                                              You can rationalize this by thinking of your $k$-arrangement having "slots", and filling them in order. The first slot can be filled by $n$ potential items, the second by $n-1$, and in general the $i^{th}$ by $n-(i+1)$. This gives



                                                              $$P(n,k) = n(n-1)(n-2)...(n-i+1)$$



                                                              It is a trivial exercise in algebra to show both expressions are equal.





                                                              This becomes relevant when we consider the selection argument. In this case we want the number of $k$-selections - the number of ways to take $k$ objects from the $n$, but this time order doesn't matter.



                                                              This is my favorite way to think of it because I didn't realize this until a few weeks ago - I had just been blindly using the known formulas until an "aha!" moment.



                                                              Consider a particular $k$-arrangement from our permutation argument. Let it be the permutation



                                                              $$(x_1,x_2,x_3,...,x_k)$$



                                                              where each $x_i$ is one of the $n$ objects. We know that, no matter which way we arrange this, however, it will be considered the same selection, because in selections/combinations, order does not matter. I could swap $x_1$ and $x_2$, or I could reverse the order, or I could order them "even-odd-even-odd" -- it doesn't matter, they're all the same one.



                                                              Which then brings up the question - how many ways are there to rearrange $k$ objects? We know this to be $P(k,k) = k!$. This means that, for every particular arrangement, it is in a sort of "class" of arrangements that are indistinct as selections. For every arrangement of $k$ objects, only one of those $k!$ arrangements is distinct - and that is for every arrangement.



                                                              That allows us to conclude that the number of selections/combinations is given by



                                                              $$C(n,k) = frac{P(n,k)}{k!}$$



                                                              Explicitly using the formula for $P(n,k)$, then,



                                                              $$C(n,k) = frac{P(n,k)}{k!} = frac{1}{k!} P(n,k) = frac{1}{k!} cdot frac{n!}{(n-k)!} = frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$$






                                                              share|cite









                                                              $endgroup$


















                                                                0












                                                                $begingroup$

                                                                My favorite way of explaining this to myself actually would be something in this vein.



                                                                Suppose we have a set of $n$ objects, and we want to find the number of unique $k$-arrangements of them - that is, take $k$ objects from the $n$, and each unique arrangement counts as a single one. The term "arrangement" is important - that means order matters. We know this to be given by



                                                                $$P(n,k) = frac{n!}{(n-k)!}$$



                                                                You can rationalize this by thinking of your $k$-arrangement having "slots", and filling them in order. The first slot can be filled by $n$ potential items, the second by $n-1$, and in general the $i^{th}$ by $n-(i+1)$. This gives



                                                                $$P(n,k) = n(n-1)(n-2)...(n-i+1)$$



                                                                It is a trivial exercise in algebra to show both expressions are equal.





                                                                This becomes relevant when we consider the selection argument. In this case we want the number of $k$-selections - the number of ways to take $k$ objects from the $n$, but this time order doesn't matter.



                                                                This is my favorite way to think of it because I didn't realize this until a few weeks ago - I had just been blindly using the known formulas until an "aha!" moment.



                                                                Consider a particular $k$-arrangement from our permutation argument. Let it be the permutation



                                                                $$(x_1,x_2,x_3,...,x_k)$$



                                                                where each $x_i$ is one of the $n$ objects. We know that, no matter which way we arrange this, however, it will be considered the same selection, because in selections/combinations, order does not matter. I could swap $x_1$ and $x_2$, or I could reverse the order, or I could order them "even-odd-even-odd" -- it doesn't matter, they're all the same one.



                                                                Which then brings up the question - how many ways are there to rearrange $k$ objects? We know this to be $P(k,k) = k!$. This means that, for every particular arrangement, it is in a sort of "class" of arrangements that are indistinct as selections. For every arrangement of $k$ objects, only one of those $k!$ arrangements is distinct - and that is for every arrangement.



                                                                That allows us to conclude that the number of selections/combinations is given by



                                                                $$C(n,k) = frac{P(n,k)}{k!}$$



                                                                Explicitly using the formula for $P(n,k)$, then,



                                                                $$C(n,k) = frac{P(n,k)}{k!} = frac{1}{k!} P(n,k) = frac{1}{k!} cdot frac{n!}{(n-k)!} = frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$$






                                                                share|cite









                                                                $endgroup$
















                                                                  0












                                                                  0








                                                                  0





                                                                  $begingroup$

                                                                  My favorite way of explaining this to myself actually would be something in this vein.



                                                                  Suppose we have a set of $n$ objects, and we want to find the number of unique $k$-arrangements of them - that is, take $k$ objects from the $n$, and each unique arrangement counts as a single one. The term "arrangement" is important - that means order matters. We know this to be given by



                                                                  $$P(n,k) = frac{n!}{(n-k)!}$$



                                                                  You can rationalize this by thinking of your $k$-arrangement having "slots", and filling them in order. The first slot can be filled by $n$ potential items, the second by $n-1$, and in general the $i^{th}$ by $n-(i+1)$. This gives



                                                                  $$P(n,k) = n(n-1)(n-2)...(n-i+1)$$



                                                                  It is a trivial exercise in algebra to show both expressions are equal.





                                                                  This becomes relevant when we consider the selection argument. In this case we want the number of $k$-selections - the number of ways to take $k$ objects from the $n$, but this time order doesn't matter.



                                                                  This is my favorite way to think of it because I didn't realize this until a few weeks ago - I had just been blindly using the known formulas until an "aha!" moment.



                                                                  Consider a particular $k$-arrangement from our permutation argument. Let it be the permutation



                                                                  $$(x_1,x_2,x_3,...,x_k)$$



                                                                  where each $x_i$ is one of the $n$ objects. We know that, no matter which way we arrange this, however, it will be considered the same selection, because in selections/combinations, order does not matter. I could swap $x_1$ and $x_2$, or I could reverse the order, or I could order them "even-odd-even-odd" -- it doesn't matter, they're all the same one.



                                                                  Which then brings up the question - how many ways are there to rearrange $k$ objects? We know this to be $P(k,k) = k!$. This means that, for every particular arrangement, it is in a sort of "class" of arrangements that are indistinct as selections. For every arrangement of $k$ objects, only one of those $k!$ arrangements is distinct - and that is for every arrangement.



                                                                  That allows us to conclude that the number of selections/combinations is given by



                                                                  $$C(n,k) = frac{P(n,k)}{k!}$$



                                                                  Explicitly using the formula for $P(n,k)$, then,



                                                                  $$C(n,k) = frac{P(n,k)}{k!} = frac{1}{k!} P(n,k) = frac{1}{k!} cdot frac{n!}{(n-k)!} = frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$$






                                                                  share|cite









                                                                  $endgroup$



                                                                  My favorite way of explaining this to myself actually would be something in this vein.



                                                                  Suppose we have a set of $n$ objects, and we want to find the number of unique $k$-arrangements of them - that is, take $k$ objects from the $n$, and each unique arrangement counts as a single one. The term "arrangement" is important - that means order matters. We know this to be given by



                                                                  $$P(n,k) = frac{n!}{(n-k)!}$$



                                                                  You can rationalize this by thinking of your $k$-arrangement having "slots", and filling them in order. The first slot can be filled by $n$ potential items, the second by $n-1$, and in general the $i^{th}$ by $n-(i+1)$. This gives



                                                                  $$P(n,k) = n(n-1)(n-2)...(n-i+1)$$



                                                                  It is a trivial exercise in algebra to show both expressions are equal.





                                                                  This becomes relevant when we consider the selection argument. In this case we want the number of $k$-selections - the number of ways to take $k$ objects from the $n$, but this time order doesn't matter.



                                                                  This is my favorite way to think of it because I didn't realize this until a few weeks ago - I had just been blindly using the known formulas until an "aha!" moment.



                                                                  Consider a particular $k$-arrangement from our permutation argument. Let it be the permutation



                                                                  $$(x_1,x_2,x_3,...,x_k)$$



                                                                  where each $x_i$ is one of the $n$ objects. We know that, no matter which way we arrange this, however, it will be considered the same selection, because in selections/combinations, order does not matter. I could swap $x_1$ and $x_2$, or I could reverse the order, or I could order them "even-odd-even-odd" -- it doesn't matter, they're all the same one.



                                                                  Which then brings up the question - how many ways are there to rearrange $k$ objects? We know this to be $P(k,k) = k!$. This means that, for every particular arrangement, it is in a sort of "class" of arrangements that are indistinct as selections. For every arrangement of $k$ objects, only one of those $k!$ arrangements is distinct - and that is for every arrangement.



                                                                  That allows us to conclude that the number of selections/combinations is given by



                                                                  $$C(n,k) = frac{P(n,k)}{k!}$$



                                                                  Explicitly using the formula for $P(n,k)$, then,



                                                                  $$C(n,k) = frac{P(n,k)}{k!} = frac{1}{k!} P(n,k) = frac{1}{k!} cdot frac{n!}{(n-k)!} = frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$$







                                                                  share|cite












                                                                  share|cite



                                                                  share|cite










                                                                  answered 1 min ago









                                                                  Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer

                                                                  6,38811237




                                                                  6,38811237






























                                                                      draft saved

                                                                      draft discarded




















































                                                                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                                                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                                      But avoid



                                                                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                                      draft saved


                                                                      draft discarded














                                                                      StackExchange.ready(
                                                                      function () {
                                                                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3120653%2fwhy-do-we-divide-permutations-to-get-to-combinations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                                      }
                                                                      );

                                                                      Post as a guest















                                                                      Required, but never shown





















































                                                                      Required, but never shown














                                                                      Required, but never shown












                                                                      Required, but never shown







                                                                      Required, but never shown

































                                                                      Required, but never shown














                                                                      Required, but never shown












                                                                      Required, but never shown







                                                                      Required, but never shown







                                                                      Popular posts from this blog

                                                                      Reichsarbeitsdienst

                                                                      Statuo de Libereco

                                                                      Tanganjiko