Problem with the Inverse CDF of Non-central F Ratio Distribution
$begingroup$
In[3]:= n = 5; n1 = 4; n2 = 6; γ = 0.05; α = 1/370;
InverseCDF[NoncentralFRatioDistribution[1, n1 - 1, n1/γ^2],
1 - α - (n - n1)/n2]
During evaluation of In[3]:= FindRoot::lstol: The line search
decreased the step size to within tolerance specified by AccuracyGoal
and PrecisionGoal but was unable to find a sufficient decrease in the
merit function. You may need more than MachinePrecision digits of
working precision to meet these tolerances. >>
Out[4]= 3.24659
The correct answer is 5468.146427955789
numerics probability-or-statistics accuracy-and-precision
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In[3]:= n = 5; n1 = 4; n2 = 6; γ = 0.05; α = 1/370;
InverseCDF[NoncentralFRatioDistribution[1, n1 - 1, n1/γ^2],
1 - α - (n - n1)/n2]
During evaluation of In[3]:= FindRoot::lstol: The line search
decreased the step size to within tolerance specified by AccuracyGoal
and PrecisionGoal but was unable to find a sufficient decrease in the
merit function. You may need more than MachinePrecision digits of
working precision to meet these tolerances. >>
Out[4]= 3.24659
The correct answer is 5468.146427955789
numerics probability-or-statistics accuracy-and-precision
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In[3]:= n = 5; n1 = 4; n2 = 6; γ = 0.05; α = 1/370;
InverseCDF[NoncentralFRatioDistribution[1, n1 - 1, n1/γ^2],
1 - α - (n - n1)/n2]
During evaluation of In[3]:= FindRoot::lstol: The line search
decreased the step size to within tolerance specified by AccuracyGoal
and PrecisionGoal but was unable to find a sufficient decrease in the
merit function. You may need more than MachinePrecision digits of
working precision to meet these tolerances. >>
Out[4]= 3.24659
The correct answer is 5468.146427955789
numerics probability-or-statistics accuracy-and-precision
New contributor
$endgroup$
In[3]:= n = 5; n1 = 4; n2 = 6; γ = 0.05; α = 1/370;
InverseCDF[NoncentralFRatioDistribution[1, n1 - 1, n1/γ^2],
1 - α - (n - n1)/n2]
During evaluation of In[3]:= FindRoot::lstol: The line search
decreased the step size to within tolerance specified by AccuracyGoal
and PrecisionGoal but was unable to find a sufficient decrease in the
merit function. You may need more than MachinePrecision digits of
working precision to meet these tolerances. >>
Out[4]= 3.24659
The correct answer is 5468.146427955789
numerics probability-or-statistics accuracy-and-precision
numerics probability-or-statistics accuracy-and-precision
New contributor
New contributor
edited 1 hour ago
gwr
7,58822558
7,58822558
New contributor
asked 4 hours ago
Abdul HaqAbdul Haq
141
141
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Use FindRoot
directly with arbitrary-precision
n = 5; n1 = 4; n2 = 6; γ = 1/20; α = 1/370;
icdf = x /.
FindRoot[CDF[NoncentralFRatioDistribution[1, n1 - 1, n1/γ^2], x] ==
1 - α - (n - n1)/n2, {x, 500},
WorkingPrecision -> $MachinePrecision]
(* 5468.146403807255 *)
Verifying,
(CDF[NoncentralFRatioDistribution[1, n1 - 1, n1/γ^2], icdf] //
RootApproximant) === 1 - α - (n - n1)/n2
(* True *)
Note that while the starting value used in FindRoot
needs to be large, it does not have to be particularly close to the actual value.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Abdul Haq is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f189524%2fproblem-with-the-inverse-cdf-of-non-central-f-ratio-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Use FindRoot
directly with arbitrary-precision
n = 5; n1 = 4; n2 = 6; γ = 1/20; α = 1/370;
icdf = x /.
FindRoot[CDF[NoncentralFRatioDistribution[1, n1 - 1, n1/γ^2], x] ==
1 - α - (n - n1)/n2, {x, 500},
WorkingPrecision -> $MachinePrecision]
(* 5468.146403807255 *)
Verifying,
(CDF[NoncentralFRatioDistribution[1, n1 - 1, n1/γ^2], icdf] //
RootApproximant) === 1 - α - (n - n1)/n2
(* True *)
Note that while the starting value used in FindRoot
needs to be large, it does not have to be particularly close to the actual value.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Use FindRoot
directly with arbitrary-precision
n = 5; n1 = 4; n2 = 6; γ = 1/20; α = 1/370;
icdf = x /.
FindRoot[CDF[NoncentralFRatioDistribution[1, n1 - 1, n1/γ^2], x] ==
1 - α - (n - n1)/n2, {x, 500},
WorkingPrecision -> $MachinePrecision]
(* 5468.146403807255 *)
Verifying,
(CDF[NoncentralFRatioDistribution[1, n1 - 1, n1/γ^2], icdf] //
RootApproximant) === 1 - α - (n - n1)/n2
(* True *)
Note that while the starting value used in FindRoot
needs to be large, it does not have to be particularly close to the actual value.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Use FindRoot
directly with arbitrary-precision
n = 5; n1 = 4; n2 = 6; γ = 1/20; α = 1/370;
icdf = x /.
FindRoot[CDF[NoncentralFRatioDistribution[1, n1 - 1, n1/γ^2], x] ==
1 - α - (n - n1)/n2, {x, 500},
WorkingPrecision -> $MachinePrecision]
(* 5468.146403807255 *)
Verifying,
(CDF[NoncentralFRatioDistribution[1, n1 - 1, n1/γ^2], icdf] //
RootApproximant) === 1 - α - (n - n1)/n2
(* True *)
Note that while the starting value used in FindRoot
needs to be large, it does not have to be particularly close to the actual value.
$endgroup$
Use FindRoot
directly with arbitrary-precision
n = 5; n1 = 4; n2 = 6; γ = 1/20; α = 1/370;
icdf = x /.
FindRoot[CDF[NoncentralFRatioDistribution[1, n1 - 1, n1/γ^2], x] ==
1 - α - (n - n1)/n2, {x, 500},
WorkingPrecision -> $MachinePrecision]
(* 5468.146403807255 *)
Verifying,
(CDF[NoncentralFRatioDistribution[1, n1 - 1, n1/γ^2], icdf] //
RootApproximant) === 1 - α - (n - n1)/n2
(* True *)
Note that while the starting value used in FindRoot
needs to be large, it does not have to be particularly close to the actual value.
answered 1 hour ago
Bob HanlonBob Hanlon
59.2k33595
59.2k33595
add a comment |
add a comment |
Abdul Haq is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Abdul Haq is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Abdul Haq is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Abdul Haq is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f189524%2fproblem-with-the-inverse-cdf-of-non-central-f-ratio-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown